Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deeper, qualitative analysis #29

Open
zhenyudg opened this issue Apr 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Deeper, qualitative analysis #29

zhenyudg opened this issue Apr 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request review rebuttal Review rebuttal

Comments

@zhenyudg
Copy link
Member

More deep analysis besides the quantitative data reporting is needed. For example,

  1. According to Section 4, each bug is categorized into three. Regarding to the first category “disjoint bugs”, the only examples come to my mind is missing statements. Did you check the instances within this category since it is against the core SBFL assumption? Unfortunately, this section presents only the quantitative data without analyzing instances. Without deep analysis, it is not clear to me what can we do with the quantitative data. In other words, what this work brings to our community is not clear.
@zhenyudg zhenyudg added review rebuttal Review rebuttal enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request review rebuttal Review rebuttal
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant