-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reevaluate presentation of sense restrictions #76
Comments
How would this work with e.g. a form that applies to multiple senses but not all? I'm going to propose an edit for 十戒, as JMdict generally seems to be more partial to notes. I personally prefer restrictions, but I guess they're unpopular. |
The more I think about this setup, the more I like it. I think I'm gonna go ahead and implement it. Sometimes the results will be a little difficult to understand, but I think that's only when the data itself is difficult to understand. For example, in the entry for よんど, 4°【しど】 doesn't technically apply to any of the senses. I think it's easier to see this through the table approach at least.
I should probably check the intersection of these sense restrictions and remove the ◇ symbol if the result is empty. |
That's actually pretty neat. I personally prefer right/top. Though with restrictions on the top the two empty rows on the left look a bit awkward.
Wouldn't it be technically possible to systematically convert notes into normal restrictions? They usually follow the same format ("occ. written as", "also written as", etc.). Maybe too outlandish. |
Discussed in #74
Originally posted by parfait8566 February 10, 2024
For example, the entry "十戒" currently looks like this:
I think it would be immediately clearer if the restriction information was shown more like this:
I guess it could look awkward if there are a ton of possible forms/readings for the same sense, but wouldn't it be possible to make it that if they exceed a certain number they revert to the previous look?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: