You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I have 2 suggestions that I will try to explain the best way possible. They are related to coins/wins balancing
My first suggestion is related to COINS. And my second is related to WINS.
Suggestion 1
1 - Can you make a way to set for each map not only the minium amount of players for a specific reward (how it is rn) but also an "else" situation if the requirements are not met.
For example:
If the number of players in the game is at least 3, the reward will be:
1st place - 3 coin(s), 2nd place - 2 coin(s), 3rd place - 1 coin(s) but....
if the requirements for that are not met (because there were less than 3 players), the reward will be:
1st place - 1 coin(s), 2nd place - 0 coin(s), 3rd place - 0 coin(s)
(Image of the current system, basically what I am suggesting is adding an "else" situation)
Suggestion 2
2 - Can you make a way to set up for each map (or globally) a minimum amount of players needed to count as a win.
For example:
If there is 3 players in the game, and someone wins, it will count as a win normally, and add to the leaderboard...
but....
if there is less than 3 players in the game, it will not count the win, that win won't be added to the leaderboard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GustavooCruz
changed the title
I have 2 suggestions
I have 2 suggestions (Economy Balancing)
May 10, 2022
Hello, I have 2 suggestions that I will try to explain the best way possible. They are related to coins/wins balancing
My first suggestion is related to COINS. And my second is related to WINS.
Suggestion 1
1 - Can you make a way to set for each map not only the minium amount of players for a specific reward (how it is rn) but also an "else" situation if the requirements are not met.
For example:
If the number of players in the game is at least 3, the reward will be:
1st place - 3 coin(s), 2nd place - 2 coin(s), 3rd place - 1 coin(s)
but....
if the requirements for that are not met (because there were less than 3 players), the reward will be:
1st place - 1 coin(s), 2nd place - 0 coin(s), 3rd place - 0 coin(s)
(Image of the current system, basically what I am suggesting is adding an "else" situation)
Suggestion 2
2 - Can you make a way to set up for each map (or globally) a minimum amount of players needed to count as a win.
For example:
If there is 3 players in the game, and someone wins, it will count as a win normally, and add to the leaderboard...
but....
if there is less than 3 players in the game, it will not count the win, that win won't be added to the leaderboard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: