You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Determining a methodology to project the same size matrix regardless of the basis set used in DFT calculations. A way to accurately/scientifically aggregate full basis set functionals into the minimal basis set (which determines the matrix size) is at the core of the problem. Given a molecule computed at different basis sets, at minimum HOMO/LUMO coefficient ordering should be the same and ideally coefficient should be similar numerically?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is true that currently we are defining the minimal basis in a very ad-hoc way (i.e. just removing the d or higher orbitals). I imagine the easiest way to do it (for small organic molecules) would be
Remove the d-orbitals
Remove all s and p-orbitals except those that are "required". How I would define "required" would be that they are formally the highest s and p orbitals expected for the molecule. For example, for carbon you would take 2s and 2p. For Cl it would be 3s and 3p and so on. So basically each atom would have exactly 1s and 3p functions. The only catch is that it would be somewhat tedious to construct such a matrix.
Determining a methodology to project the same size matrix regardless of the basis set used in DFT calculations. A way to accurately/scientifically aggregate full basis set functionals into the minimal basis set (which determines the matrix size) is at the core of the problem. Given a molecule computed at different basis sets, at minimum HOMO/LUMO coefficient ordering should be the same and ideally coefficient should be similar numerically?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: