Skip to content

Conversation

@ChiTimesChi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi commented Jun 9, 2025

Description

Isolated test fixes from #334

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use the latest version of the caching action for improved reliability.
  • Tests
    • Improved test clarity by renaming tests and explicitly asserting expected revert reasons.
    • Enhanced test precision for ownership and error handling scenarios.
    • Refined token transfer test cases to focus on relevant behaviors.
  • Refactor
    • Updated logging usage in integration scripts for consistency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates involve modifying GitHub Actions workflow files to use a newer version of the actions/cache action, updating test files to replace implicit revert expectations with explicit ones using vm.expectRevert() and more descriptive function names, and making minor changes to logging and test logic in scripts and test cases.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summary
.github/workflows/coveralls.yaml, .github/workflows/test.yaml Updated actions/cache version from v2 to v4 in workflow steps for caching node modules.
script/integration/InspectIntegration.s.sol Changed import and usage from console to console2 for logging.
test/messaging/AuthVerifier.t.sol Renamed test function and replaced implicit revert with explicit vm.expectRevert() for unauthorized set call.
test/messaging/GasFeePricing.t.sol Renamed two test functions and added explicit revert expectations; removed post-revert assertions in one test.
test/messaging/MessageBusSender.t.sol Renamed four test functions and replaced implicit revert expectations with explicit vm.expectRevert() calls.
test/router/libs/UniversalTokenLib.t.sol Removed section that tested revert on transfer to harness; rest of test unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TestContract
    participant TargetContract
    participant VM

    TestContract->>VM: expectRevert("Error message")
    TestContract->>TargetContract: Call function expected to revert
    TargetContract-->>VM: Revert with "Error message"
    VM-->>TestContract: Test passes if revert matches
Loading

Poem

In the warren, tests now hop with care,
Explicit reverts declared everywhere!
Cache hops to version four,
Console2 logs a little more.
Rabbits cheer for tidy code,
As workflows and tests lighten their load.
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 193f470 and c95feea.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/coveralls.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yaml (2 hunks)
  • script/integration/InspectIntegration.s.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/messaging/AuthVerifier.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/messaging/GasFeePricing.t.sol (2 hunks)
  • test/messaging/MessageBusSender.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/router/libs/UniversalTokenLib.t.sol (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • test/router/libs/UniversalTokenLib.t.sol
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
  • GitHub Check: hardhat-test
  • GitHub Check: foundry-integration
  • GitHub Check: foundry-base
  • GitHub Check: Build
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: foundry-base
  • GitHub Check: hardhat-test
  • GitHub Check: Build
  • GitHub Check: foundry-integration
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (8)
script/integration/InspectIntegration.s.sol (1)

6-6: LGTM! Modernized logging import and usage.

The update from console to console2 aligns with forge-std best practices and likely addresses compatibility issues with newer versions of the testing framework.

Also applies to: 12-12

test/messaging/AuthVerifier.t.sol (1)

23-27: Excellent improvement to test explicitness and readability.

The change from the testFail prefix to explicit vm.expectRevert() with the specific error message makes the test more precise and self-documenting. The revert message correctly matches OpenZeppelin's Ownable contract behavior.

test/messaging/GasFeePricing.t.sol (2)

28-32: Great improvement to test clarity and precision.

The explicit vm.expectRevert() with the specific Ownable error message makes this test more reliable and self-documenting compared to the previous testFail approach.


89-95: Improved test explicitness with correct error message.

The explicit revert expectation for the empty destination native address scenario is much clearer than the previous implicit approach. The error message "dstNativeAddress empty" correctly matches the expected validation failure.

test/messaging/MessageBusSender.t.sol (4)

53-56: Improved test precision for unset fee scenario.

The explicit revert expectation with "Fee not set" message is much clearer than the previous testFail approach and correctly validates the fee estimation behavior.


58-63: Better test clarity for wrong chain ID scenario.

The explicit revert expectation correctly captures the expected behavior when attempting to send a message to an unsupported chain ID.


66-72: Enhanced test explicitness for insufficient fee validation.

The explicit revert expectation with "Insuffient gas fee" message clearly documents the expected behavior when insufficient fees are provided. The test logic correctly uses estimatedFee - 1 to trigger the insufficient fee condition.


75-82: Comprehensive test improvement with dual revert expectations.

Excellent enhancement that explicitly tests both the estimateFee and sendMessage calls should revert with "Fee not set" when fees are unset for the destination chain. The dual vm.expectRevert() calls correctly validate both failure points.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15540353210

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 12.85%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10489777082: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 664
Relevant Lines: 4714

💛 - Coveralls

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi merged commit 60f1c25 into master Jun 18, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants