Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strange output #47

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Strange output #47

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I've got as an output file that looks very suspicious....

----
 General Geometry - Free Format

                          U :            5.600000    5.600000
                       t_up :            1.000000
                       t_dn :            1.000000
                      mu_up :            1.800000    1.800000
                      mu_dn :            1.800000    1.800000
             Time slice - L :          160
            Number of sites :           75
                       dtau :            0.050000
                       beta :            8.000000
     Number of warmup sweep :         1000
Number of measurement sweep :        10000
   Frequency of measurement :            1
                Random seed :       743334
 Frequency of recomputing G :           15
Global move number of sites :            0
               Accept count :     67737605
               Reject count :     64190494
    Approximate accept rate :            0.513443
                      gamma :            0.549749
           Type of matrix B : Checkerboard
         Type of matrix HSF : discrete
 Sign of equal time measurements:
                   Avg sign :   0.58000000E-02 +-  0.58600341E-02
                Avg up sign :   0.96000000E-02 +-  0.89977775E-02
                Avg dn sign :   0.19400000E-01 +-  0.56797887E-02
============================================================================
 Equal time measurements:
          Up spin occupancy :   0.58002266E+00 +-             NaN
        Down spin occupancy :   0.63798606E+00 +-             NaN
             <U*N_up*N_dn>  :   0.14816933E+01 +-             NaN
             Kinetic energy :  -0.68437824E+01 +-             NaN
               Total energy :  -0.39620891E+01 +-             NaN
                    Density :   0.12180087E+01 +-             NaN
                Chi_thermal :  -0.81783509E+04 +-             NaN
              Specific heat :   0.62542545E+05 +-             NaN
  XX Ferro structure factor :   0.22955761E+02 +-             NaN
  ZZ Ferro structure factor :  -0.37494198E+00 +-             NaN
           Potential energy :  -0.52873111E+00 +-             NaN
             Hopping energy :  -0.12409423E+01 +-             NaN
           Double occupancy :   0.26458809E+00 +-             NaN
      Magnetization squared :   0.17220813E+00 +-             NaN
     XX AF structure factor :   0.12999555E+02 +-             NaN
  Root Mean Square of XX AF :   0.19781772E+04 +-             NaN
     ZZ AF structure factor :  -0.99905699E+00 +-             NaN
  Root Mean Square of ZZ AF :   0.73465390E+02 +-             NaN
============================================================================


---

Original issue reported on code.google.com by iglovi...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2014 at 6:49

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Can you disable checkerboard decomposition and do the same run again?

Original comment by cxc639 on 29 Jul 2014 at 6:50

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

When I disable it output is meaningful. Attached.

May be it is related to the Issue 46 
https://code.google.com/p/quest-qmc/issues/detail?id=46

May be not.

Original comment by iglovi...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2014 at 10:56

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Actually, when I said meaningful, I was bit brave.

Yes, I do not get NaN, when I do not use checkerboard decomposition,

But I get n_up and n_down that are pretty far from each other:

n_up = 0.39
n_dn = 0.91

And I believe this violates SU(2) symmetry of the Hubbard model.

Original comment by iglovi...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2014 at 11:20

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I see, why is it going like this. Avg sign ~ 0. We should expect non physical 
values, although it does not explain NaN for the checkerboard decomposition.

Original comment by iglovi...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2014 at 11:22

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant