Replies: 4 comments
-
I would like to add a third alternative: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Unfortunately the PILOS BBB-Backend does not support the webhook API. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, that would be my suggestion as well. We use option 3 if possible and option 1 otherwise. I find option 1 better than option 2 because the advantages that option 2 offers (100% Accurat) do not justify the disadvantages of this option. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
PILOS contacts the BBB backend every minute. @frankkammer suggested to do that as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
To keep conference attendences consistent in case of a user closing the digital classroom tab, two scenarios come to mind:
The closing of the classroom-tab is immediately noted in the backend. It is possible to immediately remove the user from the datastructures holding information about the attending users. When the user reopens the tab it is not possible to reenter the rooms, since information about open tabs is not obtainable.
Pro: Easy to implement. Light on traffic.
Con: Not 100% accurat. User in conference is not visible to others on refresh, unless he rejoins the BBB conferences via new classroom tab. Better than leaving the users within the backends attendence list.
When a user connects / reconnects to the backend, the attendence of the conferences known to the backend is requested from the BBB server.
Pro: 100% Accurat.
Con: Possibly heavy traffic to BBB server & longer response times on connection. A little harder to implement.
Any thoughts on this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions