You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Good ROC curves per subject do not necessarily lead to an good "overall ROC Curve".
Calibration of the predicted probabilities between the subjects is likely to result in a higher score!
http://www.kaggle.com/c/seizure-prediction/forums/t/10383/leaderboard-metric-roc-auc
"You could plot ROC curves for each patient on your cross-validation predictions and then adjust the prediction values so that the curves 'line up' in such a way to optimise for maximum global AUC. Then use those to patch your final predictions before submission... but there's no guarantee that your predictions on the test segments will produce similar ROC curves for this to be effective. "
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good ROC curves per subject do not necessarily lead to an good "overall ROC Curve".
Calibration of the predicted probabilities between the subjects is likely to result in a higher score!
http://www.kaggle.com/c/seizure-prediction/forums/t/10383/leaderboard-metric-roc-auc
"You could plot ROC curves for each patient on your cross-validation predictions and then adjust the prediction values so that the curves 'line up' in such a way to optimise for maximum global AUC. Then use those to patch your final predictions before submission... but there's no guarantee that your predictions on the test segments will produce similar ROC curves for this to be effective. "
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: