You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the EB-AFIT algorithm tests all possible orientations of an Item in order to achieve the optimum solution. In some situations, this is not desirable (e.g. placing a book with the bottom facing outwards) and so the ability to omit certain orientations would be a beneficial enhancement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Vanman989 that is helpful, thank you, particularly the references to the literature. In the case of the EB-AFIT algorithm for 3D packing, I will have to delve into the sources code to solve the orientation issue but for 2D I can adopt these approaches
Currently, the EB-AFIT algorithm tests all possible orientations of an Item in order to achieve the optimum solution. In some situations, this is not desirable (e.g. placing a book with the bottom facing outwards) and so the ability to omit certain orientations would be a beneficial enhancement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: