Integrating TUnit in other libraries #638
dev-in-disguise
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
I'm fine with the community asking to get the support you need - the more people that do the more likely it'll happen I reckon. I'm happy to be tagged in threads and have an input or answer any questions if there is any. Regarding the API, you're right, it may change, so might just be that their versioning remains pre-release while TUnits does too so both can make changes |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi!
I've seen that there has been efforts by you to introduce TUnit also in other testing libraries like FluentAssertions.
While trying to migrate one of my work solutions to TUnit I noticed that we currently have a direct dependency on 2 other libraries that would require support for TUnit.
The first one being AutoFixture (I opened a discussion there how they would feel if someone would provide support for TUnit) and the second one being Specflow (though I'm heavily torn since that's basically discontinued and replaced by Reqnroll).
My question now would be: should we as a community try to get TUnit support in as many libraries as we can or would you rather like to do that by yourself so that you have a better overview regarding dependencies that might need to be fixed with public API changes? Or do you say it would be wiser to wait with such things until you're at version 1 of TUnit since the API might still change heavily until then?
Would love your feedback on this
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions