You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for all your work and for making this convex hull library available. I am evaluating it for use in my program.
My data sets will often contain a bunch of co-planar points. In my first tests with your tool, these cause if ( !qh.check() ) to fail. In your example, this test is accompanied with the comment // resulted structure is not convex (generally due to precision errors).
If I go ahead and try to make use of the resulting mesh, I get something messy like the following:
Is convhull expected to work in cases like this? Does convhull use robust geometric predicates for things like the 3D orientation test?
I have attached a points file corresponding to this test case.
Thanks for all your work and for making this convex hull library available. I am evaluating it for use in my program.
My data sets will often contain a bunch of co-planar points. In my first tests with your tool, these cause
if ( !qh.check() )
to fail. In your example, this test is accompanied with the comment// resulted structure is not convex (generally due to precision errors)
.If I go ahead and try to make use of the resulting mesh, I get something messy like the following:
Is convhull expected to work in cases like this? Does convhull use robust geometric predicates for things like the 3D orientation test?
I have attached a points file corresponding to this test case.
test.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: