-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
3 - Why this project is very helpful?
51 lines (36 loc) · 3.59 KB
/
3 - Why this project is very helpful?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
As you know, the design process of electrical machines contains branches, including electromagnetic design, thermal design,
mechanical design, vibration design, and drive system design.
According to Juha Pyrhonen [1], the stuff of thermal design in electrical machines is much more complicated than the clas-
sic electromagnetic design.
Empirical constants are very popular in the field of electrical machines as machine designers usually don't have the spec-
ific ability to design the thermal circuits for the machine.
The empirical constants are only valuable in the realm of standard electric motors which are used and experiments multiple
times to ensure the fruitfulness of the constants.
On the other hand, when you want to design a totally new machine, you won't be able to use constants because their preass-
umptions may not be present or applicable in the surroundings of your motor.
For such situations, the only remained way is to design the cooling system from 0 to 100.
In this project, the cooling system design and thermal analysis of a large-scale, 200kW, 6-phase, and surface-mounted per-
manent magnet synchronous motor were investigated and explained.
For implementing the cooling system, firstly the cooling performance of the motor was modeled using multi-layer perceptron
artificial neural network (MLPANN) modeling.
After modeling and system identification, it is time to optimize the cooling system. Like every optimization problem, we
should determine the decision variables, the objective function (s), and the optimization methods.
As the cooling performance of the motor is determined from fluidic, thermal, and economical perspectives, we have speci-
fied three objective functions. Therefore, we face a multi-objective optimization problem. A trade-off between the
objective functions finally determines the result of the cooling system design.
For fluidic performance, we have selected the pressure drop of cooling pipes. To consider the thermal viewpoint we moni-
tored the temperature of hotspots (in this case the hotspots appear in the end-windings.) Additionally, to include the
economic perspective, the price of cooling pipes is considered the third objective function.
After implementing the sensitivity analysis, we concluded that three decision variables are more effective in the flu-
idic, thermal, and economic performances. Firstly, the number of heat pipes directly affects the fluidic, thermal,
and economic performances. Increasing the number of heat pipes causes the temperature of hotspots to lessen, while
the total pressure drop and cost of cooling pipes would be increased directly.
As mentioned earlier, this is what we call a trade-off in the context of multi-objective optimization.
The second decision variable is the diameter of the cooling pipes. The wider the cooling pipe, the less pressure drop
will result. Moreover, because of the increased touching surface between the pipe and the motor, the temperature
of the motor would be alleviated. At the same time, the peripheral area of the pipe increases as the pipe becomes
wider. So, the cost of the cooling system escalates. The trade-off is obvious.
Thirdly, the speed of the inlet fluid of the pipe is considered as it has a substantial effect on fluidic performance.
After optimization, post-processing including various comparisons between the initial and optimal cooling systems
proves the effectiveness of optimization and the resultant cooling system.
[1] J. Pyrhonen, T. Jokinen, and V. Hrabovcova, Design of Rotating Electrical Machines: Wiley, 2009.