You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The XHOP message has a hop list. This does leak some meta-data (although insufficient to trace the path) of the full path. We want to support nested XHOPs where there may be only one or some subset of the full path in a given XHOP. A set of nested XHOPs would then be required to provide the full path.
This approach is less efficient (more complex packet) but minimizes the meta-data about the path.
This adds an extra layer of meta-data correlation protection beyond that provided by splitting the path data between in band xhop path and out of band table data maintained by each intermediary at the cost of more verbose more complex XHOP messages.
We should explicate how to use nested XHOPs.
There is no change to the packet format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The XHOP message has a hop list. This does leak some meta-data (although insufficient to trace the path) of the full path. We want to support nested XHOPs where there may be only one or some subset of the full path in a given XHOP. A set of nested XHOPs would then be required to provide the full path.
This approach is less efficient (more complex packet) but minimizes the meta-data about the path.
This adds an extra layer of meta-data correlation protection beyond that provided by splitting the path data between in band xhop path and out of band table data maintained by each intermediary at the cost of more verbose more complex XHOP messages.
We should explicate how to use nested XHOPs.
There is no change to the packet format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: