Skip to content

Commit 1944dab

Browse files
committed
Fix broken links
1 parent 8964f0c commit 1944dab

File tree

2 files changed

+2
-2
lines changed

2 files changed

+2
-2
lines changed

docs/en/compare/yolo11-vs-damo-yolo.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ This page provides a detailed technical comparison between two state-of-the-art
1919

2020
**Architecture and Key Features:**
2121

22-
YOLO11's architecture focuses on optimizing the balance between model size and accuracy. Key improvements include enhanced feature extraction layers for more detailed feature capture and a streamlined network structure to reduce computational overhead. This results in models that are not only faster but also more parameter-efficient. The architecture is designed to be flexible, allowing for deployment across diverse platforms, from edge devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) to cloud servers. YOLO11 is also easily integrated with platforms like [Ultralytics HUB](https://www.ultralytics.com/hub) for streamlined training and deployment workflows.
22+
YOLO11's architecture focuses on optimizing the balance between model size and accuracy. Key improvements include enhanced feature extraction layers for more detailed feature capture and a streamlined network structure to reduce computational overhead. This results in models that are not only faster but also more parameter-efficient. The architecture is designed to be flexible, allowing for deployment across diverse platforms, from edge devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) to cloud servers. YOLO11 is also easily integrated with platforms like [Ultralytics HUB](https://www.ultralytics.com/hub) for streamlined training and deployment workflows.
2323

2424
**Performance Metrics:**
2525

docs/en/compare/yolov9-vs-damo-yolo.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ The following table provides a comparative overview of the performance metrics f
7575
**YOLOv9 Ideal Use Cases:**
7676

7777
- **Real-time Object Detection**: Applications demanding high-speed processing, such as autonomous driving, robotics, and live video analytics ([AI in self-driving cars](https://www.ultralytics.com/solutions/ai-in-self-driving), [robotics](https://www.ultralytics.com/glossary/robotics)).
78-
- **Edge Devices**: Deployments on resource-constrained devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) where efficiency is paramount.
78+
- **Edge Devices**: Deployments on resource-constrained devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) where efficiency is paramount.
7979
- **General Object Detection Tasks**: Versatile for a wide range of object detection tasks due to its balance of speed and accuracy.
8080

8181
**DAMO-YOLO Ideal Use Cases:**

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)