Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify boilerplate about _operand_ and _resolved value_ #937

Open
aphillips opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Clarify boilerplate about _operand_ and _resolved value_ #937

aphillips opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
formatting LDML47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) normative Issue affects normative text in the specification registry Issue pertains to the function registry

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link
Member

In #932 there is a lengthy discussion about the value of an operand and about the value of a resolved value. This issue is to track consistent global resolution of those comments.
@aphillips aphillips mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2024
Merged
@aphillips
Copy link
Member Author

@macchiati commented about the value of operands and resolved value. Putting the link here so others can follow the thread in its original form.

@aphillips aphillips added registry Issue pertains to the function registry normative Issue affects normative text in the specification formatting LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference LDML47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) and removed Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate labels Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
formatting LDML47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) normative Issue affects normative text in the specification registry Issue pertains to the function registry
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@aphillips