Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: improve test coverage #33

Open
1 task done
nozomuikuta opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

test: improve test coverage #33

nozomuikuta opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@nozomuikuta
Copy link
Member

Describe the feature

I found that Citty has no test at the moment.
It's better to have at least unit tests so that we can accept new features and bug fixes from the community as well as unjs members.

I created this issue just for making the situation clear and trackable.

@pi0

Perhaps, are you postponing test implementation based one some thoughts?
If not, I will start working on this issue from adding unit tests.

Additional information

  • Would you be willing to help implement this feature?
@Barbapapazes
Copy link
Member

Barbapapazes commented Jul 8, 2024

Hey 👋,

This is a good idea. I've submitted 2 PRs to improve confidence in args and usage:

I'm sure we can go further by testing commands and more!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants