Bibliography.bib

@article{schwartz_overview_2012,
  title = {An Overview of the {{Schwartz}} Theory of Basic Values},
  volume = {2},
  timestamp = {2016-01-29T07:51:05Z},
  number = {1},
  urldate = {2015-10-30},
  journal = {Online Readings in Psychology and Culture},
  author = {Schwartz, Shalom H.},
  year = {2012},
  keywords = {Prelims Annotated},
  pages = {1--20}
}

@article{bardi_new_2008,
  title = {A New Archival Approach to the Study of Values and Value--Behavior Relations: Validation of the Value Lexicon},
  volume = {93},
  issn = {0021-9010},
  shorttitle = {A New Archival Approach to the Study of Values and Value--Behavior Relations},
  doi = {10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.483},
  abstract = {The present effort employs a new archival approach to study values and value- behavior relations, which is likely to be particularly useful in applied settings. A value lexicon was developed on the basis of the Schwartz (1992) value theory to extract lexical indicators of values from texts. The convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of this measure was established using American newspaper content from 1900 to 2000 vis-{\`a}-vis existing self-report measures of values and objective indicators of value-expressive behaviors. Results provide empirical support for the use of the value lexicon to study values and value- behavior relations. First, the value lexicon demonstrated convergence with self-report responses of values. Second, values in American newspapers were associated with objective indicators of their corresponding value-expressive behaviors compared with noncorresponding value- expressive behaviors. Third, patterns of values over this 101-year period exhibited meaningful fluctuations with major historical and political events. The discussion describes new possibilities for future research on values in many applied settings with the value lexicon. The discussion also suggests that the principles of the value lexicon could be adopted to measure other psychological constructs of interest to applied psychology.},
  language = {eng},
  timestamp = {2016-03-16T08:17:17Z},
  number = {3},
  journal = {The Journal of Applied Psychology},
  author = {Bardi, Anat and Calogero, Rachel M. and Mullen, Brian},
  month = may,
  year = {2008},
  keywords = {Archives,Humans,Prelims Annotated,Reproducibility of Results,Social Behavior,Social Values,Terminology as Topic,Vocabulary},
  pages = {483--497},
  pmid = {18457482}
}

@misc{wordnet_sql,
  title = {{{WordNet SQL}} ({{WNSQL}})},
  timestamp = {2016-09-07T03:57:17Z},
  urldate = {2016-09-07},
  howpublished = {\url{http://wnsql.sourceforge.net/}},
  journal = {WordNet},
  author = {Bou, Bernard and {Princeton University}},
  year = {2014},
  file = {WordNet SQL:/home/jacoblevernier/Documents/Document_Library/Zotero_Database/storage/4EHS7M7C/wnsql.sourceforge.net.html:text/html;Related projects - WordNet - Related projects:/home/jacoblevernier/Documents/Document_Library/Zotero_Database/storage/FRMKGSNV/related-projects.html:text/html}
}

@misc{wordnet_main_citation,
  title = {About {{WordNet}}},
  timestamp = {2016-09-07T03:51:24Z},
  urldate = {2016-09-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://wordnet.princeton.edu}},
  journal = {WordNet},
  author = {{Princeton University}},
  year = {2010}
}

@inproceedings{schmid_treetagger_probabilistic_2013,
  title = {Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees},
  timestamp = {2016-09-07T04:29:07Z},
  urldate = {2016-09-07},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of {{International Conference}} on {{New Methods}} in {{Language Processing}}},
  author = {Schmid, Helmut},
  year = {2013},
  pages = {1--9}
}

@inproceedings{nagi_new_2013,
  title = {A New Representation of {{WordNet}} Using Graph Databases},
  isbn = {978-1-61208-247-9},
  timestamp = {2016-09-07T03:01:33Z},
  booktitle = {{{DBKDA}} 2013: {{The Fifth International Conference}} on {{Advances}} in {{Databases}}, {{Knowledge}}, and {{Data Applications}}},
  author = {Nagi, Khaled},
  year = {2013},
  pages = {1--8}
}

@misc{nelson_free_association_1998,
  title = {The {{University}} of {{South Florida}} Word Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms},
  timestamp = {2016-09-07T04:15:34Z},
  urldate = {2016-05-25},
  howpublished = {\url{http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/}},
  author = {Nelson, Douglas L. and McEvoy, Cathy L. and Schreiber, Thomas A.},
  year = {1998}
}

@article{schwartz_extending_2001,
  title = {Extending the {{Cross}}-{{Cultural Validity}} of the {{Theory}} of {{Basic Human Values}} with a {{Different Method}} of {{Measurement}}},
  volume = {32},
  issn = {0022-0221, 1552-5422},
  doi = {10.1177/0022022101032005001},
  abstract = {Several studies demonstrate that Schwartz's (1992) theory of human values is valid in cultures previously beyond its range. We measured the 10 value constructs in the theory with the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ), a new and less abstract method. Analyses in representative samples in South Africa (n = 3,210) and Italy (n = 5,867) and in samples of 13- to 14-year-old Ugandan girls (n = 840) yielded structures of relations among values similar to the theoretical prototype. In an Israeli student sample (n = 200), the values exhibited convergent and discriminant validity when measured with the PVQ and with the standard value survey. Predicted relations of value priorities with a set of 10 background, personality, attitude, and behavioral variables in the four samples supported the construct validity of the values theory with an alternative method of measurement.},
  language = {en},
  timestamp = {2016-08-25T00:52:42Z},
  number = {5},
  urldate = {2016-08-25},
  journal = {Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology},
  author = {Schwartz, Shalom H. and Melech, Gila and Lehmann, Arielle and Burgess, Steven and Harris, Mari and Owens, Vicki},
  month = jan,
  year = {2001},
  keywords = {Prelims Annotated},
  pages = {519--542}
}

@article{schwartz_universals_1992,
  title = {Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: {{Theoretical}} Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries},
  volume = {25},
  shorttitle = {Universals in the {{Content}} and {{Structure}} of {{Values}}},
  timestamp = {2016-01-29T19:05:54Z},
  journal = {Advances in experimental social psychology},
  author = {Schwartz, Shalom H.},
  editor = {Berkowitz, Leonard and Zanna, Mark P.},
  year = {1992},
  keywords = {Prelims Approved by Committee,Prelims Cited in Paper,Prelims Not Yet Read},
  pages = {1--65}
}

@techreport{haybron_normative_2012,
  type = {Papers on Economics and Evolution},
  title = {Normative Foundations for Well-Being Policy},
  abstract = {This paper examines the normative principles that should guide policies aimed at promoting happiness or, more broadly, well-being. After arguing that well-being policy is both legitimate and necessary, we lay out a case for "pragmatic subjectivism": given widely accepted principles of respect for persons, well-being policy may not assume any view of well-being, subjectivist or objectivist. Rather it should promote what its intended beneficiaries see as good for them: pleasure for hedonists, excellence for Aristotelians, etc. Specifically, well-being policy should promote citizens' "personal welfare values": those values\textemdash{}and not mere preferences\textemdash{}that individuals' see as bearing on their well-being. We suggest a variety of means for determining what people value, but conclude that there is no canonical means of doing this: there will often be some indeterminacy about what people value. Finally, we consider how pragmatic subjectivism works in practice, arguing that headline measures of well-being should include subjective well-being\textemdash{}given that it is so widely and deeply valued\textemdash{}and perhaps other values as well.},
  timestamp = {2016-01-29T18:41:47Z},
  urldate = {2015-07-22},
  institution = {Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography},
  author = {Haybron, Daniel M. and Tiberius, Valerie},
  month = feb,
  year = {2012},
  keywords = {Prelims Approved by Committee,Prelims Cited in Paper,Prelims Not Yet Read},
  pages = {1--27}
}