Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Q about asymetrical barcodes #1

Open
splaisan opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Q about asymetrical barcodes #1

splaisan opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@splaisan
Copy link

Dear Vladimir,

We work with assymetrical barcodes in order to multiplex a large number of samples on our Sequel-IIe (inspired from the 16S pipeline and using the same layouts).

I read in your usage page that assymetrical barcodes are not currently supported. Very sad! This marks the end of my exploration as I cannot change that in the wet lab and multiple samples always share the same barcode on either end.

Do you have an estimate on when this could be implemented?

Thanks in advance

@vmikk
Copy link
Owner

vmikk commented Aug 28, 2023

Hello Stéphane!

Thank you for reaching out and sharing your feedback. I understand the importance of this feature, especially when you're multiplexing a large number of samples.

You're right; as of now, we don't support asymmetric barcodes. However, as a workaround, you can pre-demultiplex your data outside of NextITS and then proceed with the analysis. When doing this, you would set --input as a directory containing your fastq files and also specify --demultiplexed true.

While I don't have a concrete estimate for when asymmetric barcode support will be implemented, I genuinely believe it's a feature worth adding. We just need to allocate the time and resources to make it happen. Your feedback is invaluable in helping us prioritize such features.

On a side note, I'm curious about the nature of your barcodes. Are they "purely asymmetric" (i.e., only different barcodes on each end, like A-B), or do you also use symmetric combinations (like A-A)?

@vmikk vmikk self-assigned this Aug 28, 2023
@vmikk vmikk added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Aug 28, 2023
@vmikk vmikk added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2023
@splaisan
Copy link
Author

Hello Vladimir,

This is great news, especially since I get my reads already demuxed from the Sequel-IIe.
I try this as soon as I receive the first run.
I cant wait to see the first results.

The barcodes are the exact same used in the PB 16S kit and are purely assymetrix indeed, you can find them here (https://www.pacb.com/wp-content/uploads/Asy_M13_BUP_Sequence_384plate.xlsx). For ITS, I used the first 2 plates combination only (1 forward set and 2 reverse sets), which can be extended with a second reverse set to reach 384 plex (we normally go only until 192 plex).

Best regards

@vmikk
Copy link
Owner

vmikk commented May 15, 2024

NextITS now supports asymmetric barcodes.
Please use the --lima_barcodetype parameter to specify the barcode type.
The supported options are single, dual_symmetric (default), dual_asymmetric, and dual (for a mixture of symmetric and asymmetric barcodes).
For dual_asymmetric and dual types, barcodes should be specified as follows:

>Run01__Sample1
ACTCATCTTCCA...ACTCATCTTCCA
>Run01__Sample2
AGCAATCGGTAT...AGTAATAGGGAT
>Run01__Sample3
AGTCCACTGGTA...GACGGACTGGTG

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants