Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WCAG 3 Draft Review: Thoughts on Design Principles #618

Open
melissaegg opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

WCAG 3 Draft Review: Thoughts on Design Principles #618

melissaegg opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review

Comments

@melissaegg
Copy link

I'm writing to respond to this question posted on the editor's blog: Are there additional Design Principles and Requirements that should be included in the WCAG 3 project?

As well as these goals put forth for WCAG 3:

Goals for WCAG 3 include:

  • be easier to understand
  • cover more user needs, including more needs of people with cognitive disabilities

Please consider including design principles related to trauma-informed care in web design.

A major symptom of trauma is cognitive impairment according to the CDC (the effects of trauma have been well-researched - see CDC website here. For example, a violent childhood may continue to have long-lasting effects years later.

Many websites, even those offering assistance to people who they know have experienced traumatic situations, do not take into consideration the fundamental principles of trauma-informed care. This leads to people giving up when they are seeking help. The mental health website for veterans with content written at a post-graduate grade level may not actually be helpful at all to the intended audience.

This is also an equity issue. Note the following

  • PTSD is more common in “U.S. Latinos, African Americans, and American Indians” VA PTSD study and Child Trends study

  • Low-income young adults are more likely to have exposure to trauma Public Health study

  • Trauma interferes with education and disproportionately targets students of color, students with disabilities, and those living in poverty MADC paper

I'm happy to help in this area (background in user experience and trauma-informed design.) Those of us working in tech inadvertently harm people who have already been through traumatic experiences by aggravating the trauma with our lack of care. We can be more inclusive and accessible by following trauma-informed care principles in our tech work.

@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added the section: Requirements Related to Silver Requirements document label Apr 6, 2022
@lseeman
Copy link

lseeman commented Apr 11, 2022

Hi

Have you seen the work of COGA (the cognitive accessibility task fource?
Such as Making Content Usable for People with Cognitive and Learning disabilities - W3C? Also see our wiki at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/Main_Page

COGA is now working on mental health. Be In Touch if you would like to be involved. I can let you know how to join the task fource

@melissaegg
Copy link
Author

@lseeman I think this is why my friend told me to get in touch! I have not seen this before though - terrific. I would like to learn more about being involved please. Thank you!

@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley removed the section: Requirements Related to Silver Requirements document label May 24, 2022
@rachaelbradley
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed draft response: The requirements document currently includes criteria on broad disability support. Part of that goal is to better support people with cognitive and learning disabilities. The best way to incorporate more guidance in that area is to work with the COGA task force or community group. Do you have the information you need to connect with them?

@melissaegg
Copy link
Author

@rachaelbradley yes, I can see people I can email when I have space to contribute! thank you all for putting this on my radar.

@cwadamsoforacle cwadamsoforacle added the survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review label Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants