A possible typo in the GRANDPA paper, page 7, line 6. I check the .tex source file, it looks like:
given by the last block in the chain with head $g(V_{r,v})$ for which it is possible for $C_{r,r}$ to have a supermajority.
I figure it should be:
it is possible for $C_{r,v}$ to have a supermajority