You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This still does not allow multiple copies of the same
correspondence (though it is not clear why one would ever want this).
When using inference rules, process names (such as "TimesProc") must
be constant. Otherwise they get refreshed with the latest counter like
every other variable (e.g. "TimesProc8").
I feel there is a better way to do this than adding a prefix for each
correspondence, but this will require some rethinking of the embedding
and quite a bit of refactoring.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What if process definitions are polymorphic to the 2 required types? Would this work? This would also fix the mess that is the Cll_terms module as we would simply instantiate the definition.
See ede9a5f
This still does not allow multiple copies of the same
correspondence (though it is not clear why one would ever want this).
When using inference rules, process names (such as "TimesProc") must
be constant. Otherwise they get refreshed with the latest counter like
every other variable (e.g. "TimesProc8").
I feel there is a better way to do this than adding a prefix for each
correspondence, but this will require some rethinking of the embedding
and quite a bit of refactoring.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: