Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Cardano to Nakamoto Coefficient Calculator #47

Open
thenic95 opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 18 comments
Open

Add Cardano to Nakamoto Coefficient Calculator #47

thenic95 opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 18 comments

Comments

@thenic95
Copy link

thenic95 commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi,

I would like to propose the addition of the Cardano blockchain to the Nakomoto Coefficient Calculator.

Cardano is one of the most decentralized layer-1 networks and is also quoted among the fantastic messari report mentioned in the README.

I'd happily assist with any questions or requests you have.

@Cerkoryn
Copy link

Cerkoryn commented Dec 4, 2023

I support this proposal. Additionally, you can find information on Cardano's Nakamoto Coefficient (referred to as MAV or Minimum Attack Vector by many) on the following Cexplorer and Balance websites:

https://www.balanceanalytics.io/chartboards/donut_shop

https://cexplorer.io/groups

@matiwinnetou
Copy link

+1

@conraddit
Copy link

+1

Cardano is a Top 5 blockchain (excluding stables) so it must be on the list.

We also have the largest crypt community.

@alfredonodo
Copy link

Hi,
there is already a pull request about this.

@Bhugaboo
Copy link

Bhugaboo commented Dec 4, 2023

+1

@ccgarant
Copy link

ccgarant commented Dec 4, 2023

+1 to add Cardano and use accurate community vetted pool group MAV API from BALANCE. DM or reach out for any assistance.

https://www.balanceanalytics.io/chartboards/donut_shop

@anselmorei
Copy link

+1

@Hornan7
Copy link

Hornan7 commented Dec 5, 2023

+1 I would like to support this proposal to add Cardano as well. With the coming Governance mechanisms and the Voltaire era, it would be a great addition to the Nakamoto Coefficient Calculator.

@bpmiguel
Copy link

bpmiguel commented Dec 5, 2023

+1

1 similar comment
@MokhFn
Copy link

MokhFn commented Jun 4, 2024

+1

@ccgarant
Copy link

ccgarant commented Jun 4, 2024

Hello, any updates here?

@FilippoScaramuzza
Copy link

Hello, any updates here?

Hello, @ccgarant! I'm the author of the first PR for the Cardano chain (#43). We'd like to hear from you as we have a doubt about the API tokens. Can you jump to that PR and take a look at it? Thanks.

@GilbertStClr
Copy link

Hello, thank you for taking interest in the BALANCE web app data. The data used by the web app (via API Token referenced above) is specifically tailored to each visual and should not be used for other purposes. I will be sure to correct this confusion going forward. As for obtaining any BALANCE data for third party uses, I would be more than happy to prepare a new endpoint (with new token) that meets your specific needs. Please do provide the details per the data requirements and I will see what I can do. Thanks again!!

@FilippoScaramuzza
Copy link

As for obtaining any BALANCE data for third party uses, I would be more than happy to prepare a new endpoint (with new token) that meets your specific needs. Please do provide the details per the data requirements and I will see what I can do.

Thank you! A subset of the data in https://api.balanceanalytics.io/rpc/pool_group_stake_donut should be enough. I think, for our purposes, we need just, for each group, the label and the stake.

@GilbertStClr
Copy link

Understood. Are you primarily interested in the current epoch or would you like historical data as well?

@MokhFn
Copy link

MokhFn commented Jul 3, 2024

I'd say the current epoch only, i'll let Filippo confirm.

On the other hand, is it possible to expose this endpoint without any auth needed ?

The token, might expire or be update at some point with cascading effects if third parties aren't updated.
And being publicly used, i don't see an issue with making the endpoint auth-less.

@FilippoScaramuzza
Copy link

Yes, the current epoch should be sufficient. Thank you.

@MokhFn makes a valid point; having it auth-less would be great.

@GilbertStClr
Copy link

Ok, not a problem. I will set this up to support call without authentication. Thanks!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests