Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fat jar with REGEXP and other common extensions? #1125

Closed
ryanhamilton opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Fat jar with REGEXP and other common extensions? #1125

ryanhamilton opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@ryanhamilton
Copy link

Hi,
I'm the author of qStudio an SQL IDE for data analysts that includes drivers for sqlite: https://www.timestored.com/qstudio/
Currently I embed https://github.com/xerial/sqlite-jdbc but users have raised an issue with REGEXP missing (timeseries/qstudio#50) .
THis issue has been raised 4 times on your repo: https://github.com/xerial/sqlite-jdbc/issues?q=is%3Aissue++regexp

Would you consider releasing a "Fat" JDBC driver with REGEXP and other standard calls?

Alternatives

  1. I create a bundle or add REGEXP for qStudio. -> can't as we support 30+ databases and I can't support them to that level.
  2. Let the user bring their own jar -> this is currently possible in qStudio but 90% of users don't have the skills to add it. 99% don't have the skill to build such a jar.
  3. ?
@gotson
Copy link
Collaborator

gotson commented Jun 7, 2024

it's already supported as user functions, it won't be added as default. If REGEXP is really necessary, it should be requested at SQLite and added in the C code.

@gotson gotson closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 7, 2024
@gotson gotson added question Further information is requested and removed triage labels Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants