You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear developpers,
In Spacetime.py, a quasi universal relation on the dimensionless mass quadrupole uses fits established in Algendy & Morsink 2014.
However, it seems that the hard coded value of beta1 is not the one reported in Table 1 (page 4) of Algendy & Morsink 2014, see copy of this table:
It should be (according to the paper) 0.4454 and it is coded 0.4554.
Well noticed! I think those seem indeed typos. Luckily, I think we are usually not using this function q() (to be confirmed though). Anyway, makes sense to fix it (or remove if not needed at all). And I am not sure about the puzzling line. Should look more into that.
Dear developpers,

In Spacetime.py, a quasi universal relation on the dimensionless mass quadrupole uses fits established in Algendy & Morsink 2014.
However, it seems that the hard coded value of beta1 is not the one reported in Table 1 (page 4) of Algendy & Morsink 2014, see copy of this table:
It should be (according to the paper) 0.4454 and it is coded 0.4554.
xpsi/xpsi/Spacetime.py
Line 202 in a3fd654
This is in lines ~ 190 of Spacetime.py. Can you confirm that this is a typo ?
Also in the same function, does someone knows why there is no minus sign in front of the 0.11, value for the a2 parameter ?
xpsi/xpsi/Spacetime.py
Line 200 in a3fd654
And finally, I am a bit puzzled by this line
xpsi/xpsi/Spacetime.py
Line 201 in a3fd654
that I cannot seem to find in the paper of Algendy & Morsink. Would you happend to know what it does ?
Kind regards,
Lami Suleiman.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: