-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different treatment start dates and rearranging to calculate ATT #64
Comments
Dear SVK,
Great question. The units are considered in the estimation process. They
may contribute to the estimated dynamic ATT due to rearrangement.
The negative counterfactuals can be due to a lack of overlap in the
loadings. If you like, you can send me and Ziyi an email with your sample
data and code.
***@***.***
***@***.***
Best,
Yiqing
…On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:46 PM svknair ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello Yiqing,
I have a setting similar to the Example 2 (voter turnout) given here:
https://yiqingxu.org/packages/gsynth/gsynth_examples.html <http://url>.
And my question is specifically related to different treatment times for
various treated units.
After estimation, I see that some rearrangement based on the timing of
treatment is done to calculate the ATT. When I examine the difference
between actual outcome and predicted Y(0) for individual treated units over
time (from the values in out$eff.cnt), it seems all treated units are
rearranged in such a way that the treatment time coincides for all treated
units. So, it seems the difference between actual outcome and predicted
Y(0) is not calculated for some time periods for units that are treated
later. Does this mean that some of the pretreatment period observations of
units that get treated later are not considered in the estimation process?
The rearrangement also means that some treated units do not have an
estimated treatment effect in the last few time periods. And the ATT in the
last few time periods is based on some of the units that got treated first.
I just want to make sure that I am reading the results correctly.
I also see that some of the estimated counterfactuals for some treated
units are negative. That looks problematic to me. Could I be doing anything
wrong? Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
SVK
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#64>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2PKGADZXRZLEK2ZBE4FATT5LYDXANCNFSM5CK4AQJA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&utm_campaign=notification-email>
.
--
Yiqing Xu
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
Stanford University
https://yiqingxu.org/
|
Dear Yiqing, Thank you for the clarification! I will send you my sample data and code. Thanks, |
Hi Yiqing, I emailed you my sample data and code at the email id on your website. Hope you received it. Thanks, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello Yiqing,
I have a setting similar to the Example 2 (voter turnout) given here: https://yiqingxu.org/packages/gsynth/gsynth_examples.html. And my question is specifically related to different treatment times for various treated units.
After estimation, I see that some rearrangement based on the timing of treatment is done to calculate the ATT. When I examine the difference between actual outcome and predicted Y(0) for individual treated units over time (from the values in out$eff.cnt), it seems all treated units are rearranged in such a way that the treatment time coincides for all treated units. So, it seems the difference between actual outcome and predicted Y(0) is not calculated for some time periods for units that are treated later. Does this mean that some of the pretreatment period observations of units that get treated later are not considered in the estimation process? The rearrangement also means that some treated units do not have an estimated treatment effect in the last few time periods. And the ATT in the last few time periods is based on some of the units that got treated first. I just want to make sure that I am reading the results correctly.
I also see that some of the estimated counterfactuals for some treated units are negative. That looks problematic to me. Could I be doing anything wrong? Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
SVK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: