Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

constant 100% cpu usage with Electrum ZCL wallet 1.0.3 in Win8 x64 #110

Open
aleqx opened this issue Feb 19, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

constant 100% cpu usage with Electrum ZCL wallet 1.0.3 in Win8 x64 #110

aleqx opened this issue Feb 19, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@aleqx
Copy link

aleqx commented Feb 19, 2018

Launched, chose to import 3 private keys, did so, then it kept the CPU at 100% ever since, and it's been more than 1h. The interface is very slow. On a Core i7-3770K @ 5.0 GHz, 32 GB RAM. Something's wrong here.

It's connected, I can see my balances and transaction. It's just utterly slow and eating CPU badly.

@upbqdn
Copy link

upbqdn commented Feb 19, 2018

100% CPU usage on Linux (Manjaro) as well.

@pipertomcat
Copy link

you're mining bitcoin private for them lol

@aleqx
Copy link
Author

aleqx commented Feb 20, 2018

you're mining bitcoin private for them lol

🙄... false, guess why.

@aleqx
Copy link
Author

aleqx commented Feb 20, 2018

It finally quieted down after a few hours in my case. Looking forward to v1.1.0

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2019

Please try the latest release with your backed up wallet.
Don't forget to go to Tools -> Network -> Server and use either electrum.zclcore.com:50002 or electrum.schlachter.mx:50002.

Can this issue be closed (no news since almost one year) ?

@aleqx
Copy link
Author

aleqx commented Feb 7, 2019

Wasn't ZCL supposed to be dead by now?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 7, 2019

Its ~$100 value has been killed by the BTCP fork in february 2018.
Now both ZCL and BTCP worth around $1...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants