Skip to content

Two buffer overflow vulnerabilities in Zephyr USB code

Moderate
ceolin published GHSA-4vgv-5r6q-r6xh Aug 12, 2023

Package

Zephyr

Affected versions

< 3.4.0

Patched versions

3..4.0

Description

Summary

While reading the Zephyr code related to USB, I noticed a couple of buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the following locations:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/v3.3-branch/drivers/usb/device/usb_dc_native_posix.c#L359
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/v3.3-branch/subsys/usb/device/class/netusb/function_rndis.c#L841

Details

The first buffer overflow vulnerability is located in the following function:

int usb_dc_ep_write(const uint8_t ep, const uint8_t *const data,
		    const uint32_t data_len, uint32_t * const ret_bytes)
{
	LOG_DBG("ep %x len %u", ep, data_len);

	if (!usbip_ctrl.attached || !usbip_ep_is_valid(ep)) {
		LOG_ERR("Not attached / Invalid endpoint: EP 0x%x", ep);
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	/* Check if IN ep */
	if (USB_EP_GET_DIR(ep) != USB_EP_DIR_IN) {
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	/* Check if ep enabled */
	if (!usbip_ep_is_enabled(ep)) {
		LOG_WRN("ep %x disabled", ep);
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	if (USB_EP_GET_IDX(ep) == 0) {
		if (!usbip_send_common(ep, data_len)) {
			return -EIO;
		}

		if (usbip_send(ep, data, data_len) != data_len) {
			return -EIO;
		}
	} else {
		uint8_t ep_idx = USB_EP_GET_IDX(ep);
		struct usb_ep_ctrl_prv *ctrl = &usbip_ctrl.in_ep_ctrl[ep_idx];

		memcpy(ctrl->buf, data, data_len); /* VULN */
		ctrl->buf_len = data_len;
	}

	if (ret_bytes) {
		*ret_bytes = data_len;
	}

	return 0;
}

A check on data_len is missing. If data and data_len are attacker-controlled, the fixed-size buffer buf in the following structure could overflow during memcpy(), thus potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution:

struct usb_ep_ctrl_prv {
	u8_t ep_ena;
	u16_t mps;
	usb_dc_ep_callback cb;
	u32_t data_len;
	u8_t buf[64];
	u8_t buf_len;
};

The second buffer overflow vulnerability is located in the following function:

static int handle_encapsulated_rsp(uint8_t **data, uint32_t *len)
{
	struct net_buf *buf;

	LOG_DBG("");

	buf = net_buf_get(&rndis_tx_queue, K_NO_WAIT);
	if (!buf) {
		LOG_ERR("Error getting response buffer");
		*len = 0U;
		return -ENODATA;
	}

	if (VERBOSE_DEBUG) {
		net_hexdump("RSP <", buf->data, buf->len);
	}

	memcpy(*data, buf->data, buf->len); /* VULN */
	*len = buf->len;

	net_buf_unref(buf);

	return 0;
}

A check on buf->len is missing. If buf->data and buf->len are attacker-controlled, the data buffer could overflow due to memcpy(), thus potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

PoC

I haven't tried to reproduce these potential vulnerabilities against a live install of the Zephyr OS.

Impact

If the vulnerabilities are confirmed, their impact could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution.

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Physical
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

CVE ID

CVE-2023-4265

Weaknesses

Credits