Implement diamond pattern for CV Strategy #460
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Gemini Code Review encountered an error. Here is the step log: |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's great that there are no obvious logic or security flaws in the updated code! However, "no news is not always good news" when it comes to security and logic. Here's why and what else to consider:
Possible Scenarios:
- The changes were purely cosmetic: Maybe the update only involved formatting, comments, or documentation. While these are important for maintainability, they don't directly impact security or logic.
- The crucial logic remains unchanged: The update might focus on a different part of the codebase. If the core logic handling security or critical operations is untouched, you wouldn't find issues there.
- Subtle vulnerabilities: Some vulnerabilities are tricky to spot without deep analysis or runtime testing. A simple code review might miss things like race conditions, logic bombs, or edge cases leading to security holes.
Recommendations:
- Understand the scope of the changes: What was the purpose of the update? Knowing this helps you focus your review on potentially impacted areas.
- Don't neglect testing: Even if the code looks fine, rigorous testing (unit, integration, security) is crucial to uncover hidden issues.
- Employ static analysis tools: Automated tools can catch potential issues that human reviewers might miss.
- Consider a second opinion: If the code is critical, having another developer review it can provide valuable insights.
Remember: Security and robust logic are ongoing processes, not one-time checks. Stay vigilant even with seemingly minor code changes!
</details>
- Refactor token fetching logic to conditionally exclude signaling type proposals while enhancing proposal data handling. - Modified the ProposalForm component to conditionally enable token fetching and loading spinner display based on the proposal type. - Refactor the ProposalCard component to streamline the handling of signaling type proposals and optimize the conviction reading logic. - Added proposalType parameter to conditionally enable the calculateThreshold function based on the PoolTypes.
Fix singaling not loading by ignoring token & update chart to match visual total support
# Conflicts: # apps/web/components/ProposalCard.tsx # apps/web/hooks/useConvictionRead.ts
399 pool form touchup
# Conflicts: # apps/web/components/ProposalCard.tsx
Proposal countdown
- Removed the unused `proposalType` variable from the Page component properties.
Proposal countdownnn
- Introduced a new function `onBackClicked` to handle the back button click event. - The function splits the current path into segments, removes the last segment and checks if there are 3 segments left. If so, it removes another segment. - This new path is then used to navigate back instead of using router's default back method.
- Added new class and color attributes to the MarkdownEditor component - This enhances visual clarity and user experience by providing a more subtle, muted color scheme
- Removed unnecessary import of `zeroAddress` from "viem" - Deleted commented out code block that was not being used, improving readability and maintainability.
- Updated the code to handle cases where `poolTokenAddress` is null or undefined. - Now, if `poolTokenAddress` is not available, it will default to `zeroAddress`. This prevents potential crashes and ensures smoother operation.
Back button always navigate to parent
Fixing-beta-v2
…d > TotalActivatedPoints
…salId page when conn address not reg in comm
…eded in not garden pool token proposal forms
Co-authored-by: Corantin <corantin.noll@gmail.com>
Fixing dev 2
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.