Skip to content

chore(fix): add fix #221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

chore(fix): add fix #221

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

losndu
Copy link
Collaborator

@losndu losndu commented Jan 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Optimized article serialization by removing related articles from list view
    • Simplified article list representation while maintaining detailed article view functionality

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the article_serializer.py file, specifically targeting the ArticleListSerializer class. The changes involve removing the related_articles field from the list serializer and adding it to the exclusion list in the Meta class. This adjustment simplifies the list representation of articles by removing related articles information, while maintaining the detailed article serialization in the ArticleSerializer.

Changes

File Change Summary
server/apps/research/serializers/article_serializer.py - Removed related_articles field from ArticleListSerializer
- Added related_articles to ArticleListSerializer.Meta.exclude list

Poem

🐰 A serializer's tale, light and neat,
Related articles now take a backseat
In list view, they quietly hide
While detail view keeps them with pride
A rabbit's code, trimmed with care! 📜✂️


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27929dd and bfd6600.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/apps/research/serializers/article_serializer.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
server/apps/research/serializers/article_serializer.py (1)

56-56: Confirm no unintended references to related_articles in ArticleListSerializer.

Removing this field from the exclude list ensures the list serializer no longer returns related articles. If this matches the intended architecture—keeping related articles visible only in the detailed serializer—then it’s a valid approach. However, please verify there are no other references or assumptions in the codebase expecting the list serializer to include related_articles.

✅ Verification successful

No unintended references to related_articles in ArticleListSerializer found

Based on the codebase analysis, removing related_articles from the exclude list in ArticleListSerializer is safe. The field is properly handled in the detailed ArticleSerializer with its associated methods (get_related_articles), and there are no direct references or dependencies on related_articles within the list serializer context. The architecture correctly maintains related articles visibility only in the detailed view.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no references rely on `related_articles` within `ArticleListSerializer`.

# Search for references to ArticleListSerializer.
rg -A 5 'ArticleListSerializer' 

# Look for references to `related_articles` in combination with ArticleListSerializer.
rg -A 3 'ArticleListSerializer' | rg 'related_articles'

Length of output: 1712


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to related_articles in the codebase
rg -A 3 'related_articles'

# Also check the ArticleListSerializer implementation more thoroughly
ast-grep --pattern 'class ArticleListSerializer {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 7113


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@losndu losndu merged commit 9894b62 into main Jan 3, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant