Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(lint): lint and test helm chart #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

TartanLeGrand
Copy link
Contributor

@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand commented Jun 30, 2024

🌟 This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for linting and testing Helm charts upon every pull request. It ensures all charts meet our quality standards before they can be merged into the main branch.

🛠 Details:

  • Environment: Utilizes ubuntu-latest for running the jobs.
  • Key Actions:
    • 📦 Checkout: Fetches the code with full history.
    • Set up Helm: Configures Helm (v3.14.4) using Azure's Helm setup action.
    • 🐍 Set up Python: Prepares Python environment, targeting the latest release of the 3.x series.
    • 📊 Chart Testing: Uses Helm's chart-testing-action to perform list changes, lint, and install tests based on the changes detected in Helm charts.

🎯 Workflow Triggers:

  • 🔄 The workflow is triggered on every pull request, ensuring that changes are tested before they reach the main branch.

⚙️ Additional Configurations:

  • 🌐 Kind Cluster: Creates a Kubernetes-in-Docker (kind) cluster if changes are detected, providing an isolated environment for testing chart installations.

👀 Reviewers:

🔍 Please review the setup and the steps included in the workflow. Let's ensure our Helm charts are up to the standards and ready for deployment without issues.

🔄 Impact:

💪 This action will enhance our CI/CD pipeline by automating the testing process, catching potential issues early in the development cycle.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new linting and testing workflow for pull requests.
  • Chores

    • Updated workflow trigger to run on all pull requests.
    • Updated maintainers' names and URLs in the Helm chart.
    • Improved comment formatting and naming conventions in values.yaml.
    • Specified the chart path in helmfile.yaml.
  • Style

    • Enhanced configuration file readability and consistency by adjusting comment formatting and section indentation.

@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand requested a review from a team as a code owner June 30, 2024 19:10
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes include updating the GitHub workflow triggers, adding a new workflow for linting and testing charts, refining maintainers' details in the Chart.yaml, improving formatting in values.yaml, and modifying the helmfile.yaml to specify the chart path.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/conventional-commits-check.yaml Updated the event trigger from a specific branch to pull_request.
.github/workflows/lint-test.yaml Introduced a new workflow for linting and testing charts on pull requests.
charts/n8n/Chart.yaml Updated maintainers' section details for 8gears AG and n8n Community.
values.yaml Improved comment formatting by adding space before section names.
charts/n8n/values.yaml Standardized spaces in section names for consistency and readability.
helmfile.yaml Changed the chart path from . to ./charts/n8n.

Poem

In the field of code so bright,
Changes dance in the moonlight.
Workflows now with broader cheer,
And maintainers' names are clear.
A new path for charts we see,
In a world of YAML harmony.
🌟🐇🚀


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are always opted into early access features.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand marked this pull request as draft June 30, 2024 19:11
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7c4dd1 and 73d1289.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
.github/workflows/lint-test.yaml (7)

1-7: LGTM!

The workflow is correctly triggered on pull requests and defines a job that runs on ubuntu-latest.


8-13: LGTM!

The Checkout step uses the actions/checkout@v3 action and correctly fetches the code with full history.


14-18: LGTM!

The Set up Helm step uses the azure/setup-helm@v4.2.0 action to set up Helm version v3.14.4.


19-23: LGTM!

The Set up Python step uses the actions/setup-python@v5 action to set up the latest release of Python 3.x.


24-26: LGTM!

The Set up chart-testing step uses the helm/chart-testing-action@v2.6.1 action.


35-37: LGTM!

The Run chart-testing (lint) step runs the ct lint command if changes are detected.


39-45: LGTM!

The Create kind cluster step uses the helm/kind-action@v1.10.0 action, and the Run chart-testing (install) step runs the ct install command if changes are detected.

.github/workflows/lint-test.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73d1289 and 3495724.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml (1 hunks)
  • values.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • values.yaml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml

@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand force-pushed the ci/lint-test-helm branch 6 times, most recently from 9dca962 to e7bbf55 Compare June 30, 2024 19:44
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3495724 and e7bbf55.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Chart.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • charts/n8n/Chart.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/conventional-commits-check.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml (1 hunks)
  • charts/n8n/values.yaml (10 hunks)
  • helmfile.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/conventional-commits-check.yaml
  • helmfile.yaml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml
Additional context used
GitHub Check: lint-test
charts/n8n/values.yaml

[failure] 4-4:
4:19 [comments] too few spaces before comment


[failure] 9-9:
9:23 [comments] too few spaces before comment


[failure] 10-10:
10:27 [comments] too few spaces before comment


[failure] 14-14:
14:9 [comments] too few spaces before comment


[failure] 120-120:
120:18 [comments] too few spaces before comment

Additional comments not posted (13)
charts/n8n/values.yaml (13)

69-69: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# port:
+# port:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


204-204: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# lifecycle:
+# lifecycle:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


55-55: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# executions:
+# executions:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


67-67: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# path:
+# path:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


70-70: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# listen_address:
+# listen_address:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


65-65: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# generic:
+# generic:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


90-90: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# endpoints:
+# endpoints:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


73-73: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# ssl_cert:
+# ssl_cert:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


72-72: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# ssl_key:
+# ssl_key:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


95-95: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# externalHookFiles:
+# externalHookFiles:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


50-50: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# credentials:
+# credentials:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


71-71: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# protocol:
+# protocol:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


29-29: Adjust comment formatting.

Ensure consistent spacing before comments for better readability.

-# database:
+# database:

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

charts/n8n/values.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand force-pushed the ci/lint-test-helm branch 5 times, most recently from 5f95c9b to 4e87c01 Compare June 30, 2024 20:06
@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2024 20:11
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e7bbf55 and 2e3900c.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Chart.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • charts/n8n/Chart.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/conventional-commits-check.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml (1 hunks)
  • charts/n8n/Chart.yaml (1 hunks)
  • charts/n8n/values.yaml (11 hunks)
  • helmfile.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • charts/n8n/Chart.yaml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/conventional-commits-check.yaml
  • .github/workflows/lint-test.yaml
  • charts/n8n/values.yaml
  • helmfile.yaml

@TartanLeGrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

#97 @Vad1mo 😄

@Vad1mo
Copy link
Member

Vad1mo commented Jul 2, 2024

Cool, thank you very much

@Vad1mo
Copy link
Member

Vad1mo commented Jul 2, 2024

I'll take a look at it

.github/workflows/lint-test.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@Vad1mo Vad1mo merged commit 975df47 into 8gears:main Jul 3, 2024
2 checks passed
@TartanLeGrand TartanLeGrand deleted the ci/lint-test-helm branch July 3, 2024 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants