Return null if invalid enum is encountered#2865
Draft
blmhemu wants to merge 1 commit into99designs:masterfrom
Draft
Return null if invalid enum is encountered#2865blmhemu wants to merge 1 commit into99designs:masterfrom
blmhemu wants to merge 1 commit into99designs:masterfrom
Conversation
d916f91 to
27ca2fc
Compare
Author
|
Hi @StevenACoffman (Sorry if I tagged the wrong person) and gqlgen team, |
Collaborator
|
Hey, so breaking compatibility with the GraphQL spec is not something most people will want, so I would want to only enable this behavior with a config option and have it default to off. That said, I'm not sure it is even a common enough desire to add this PR. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your PR and link to any relevant issues.
In the current scenario, invalid enums are propagated to the client. This PR sends a null instead - while the graphql spec insists on returning a type error, I found this to be less breaking.
I have: