Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add warning if TGeo materialScan hits TGeoTessellated volumes. See gi… #1324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

MarkusFrankATcernch
Copy link
Contributor

BEGINRELEASENOTES
Add warning if TGeo materialScan hits TGeoTessellated volumes.

The DDRec MaterialManager and hence the corresponding MaterialScan use TGeo tracking through volumes.
Tracking in TGeo is not implemented for tessellated shapes as they result from CAD shapes. Though TGeo tracking is used
in the material scanner.... In TGeo tessellated surfaces behave like their bounding box. Hence they have no real shape
and for this reason you only see a "box".
TGeo tracking for tessellated shapes will only be implemented once TGeo moves to VecGeom. This will still take some time.

See github issue #1322 for details about the discussion.
ENDRELEASENOTES

@MarkusFrankATcernch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresailer Hi Andre, is there some issue with /dev3 ?
It cannot be me honestly....

@andresailer
Copy link
Member

@andresailer Hi Andre, is there some issue with /dev3 ? It cannot be me honestly....

Yes @MarkusFrankATcernch this looks like an issue with dev3

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Test Results

   11 files     11 suites   4h 55m 16s ⏱️
  366 tests   165 ✅ 0 💤 201 ❌
1 506 runs  1 300 ✅ 0 💤 206 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit a331842.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@andresailer andresailer merged commit df37005 into AIDASoft:master Sep 19, 2024
8 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants