Skip to content

Security: AdaptiveIntelligenceCircle/AIC-DePin

Security

Security.md

Security

Security Philosophy

AIC-DePIN is designed under the assumption that no environment is inherently trustworthy.

Security in AIC-DePIN is behavioral, adaptive, and revocable, not static or purely cryptographic.

Core principles:

  • Zero-trust between nodes
  • Trust must be earned through behavior
  • No permanent authority or irreversible privilege
  • Every decision is observable, auditable, and reversible
  • Security is a continuous process, not a final state

In AIC-DePIN, security is not a shield — it is a living system.


Threat Model

AIC-DePIN is explicitly designed to tolerate and mitigate:

  • Sybil attacks (mass fake node creation)
  • Collusion between subsets of nodes
  • Resource fraud (false CPU, bandwidth, or storage claims)
  • Eclipse and isolation attacks
  • Slow poisoning / long-con attacks
  • Trust manipulation over time
  • Human-layer attacks (social engineering, incentive abuse)

Out of scope (by design):

  • Full nation-state physical takeover
  • Large-scale physical destruction of infrastructure

Core Security Mechanisms

Trust-Weighted Execution

  • Task allocation is weighted by trust, not raw capacity
  • Trust decays over time without verified contribution
  • High trust increases responsibility, not immunity

Behavioral Slashing

Slashing in AIC-DePIN is not limited to tokens.

Possible penalties include:

  • Trust score collapse
  • Priority reduction
  • Role revocation
  • Temporary or permanent exclusion

Quarantine and Rollback

  • Suspicious nodes are isolated before full expulsion
  • Task results can be invalidated and replayed
  • No single node result is final by default

Diversity Enforcement

To prevent monoculture failures:

  • Quorum composition enforces diversity across:

    • Implementation
    • Geography
    • Organization
    • Resource profile

Human-in-the-Loop Security

Humans may intervene when:

  • Disputes exceed automated resolution
  • Ethical ambiguity arises
  • Governance-level overrides are required

Human authority is limited and auditable:

  • All interventions are logged
  • Decisions are reversible
  • Human actions affect trust, not absolute control

Vulnerability Reporting

  • Do not publicly disclose unpatched vulnerabilities
  • Follow responsible disclosure practices
  • Report issues via SECURITY.md

Priority categories:

  1. Remote execution vulnerabilities
  2. Trust poisoning vectors
  3. Consensus manipulation mechanisms

There aren’t any published security advisories