Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: A couple of missed old trait checks #379

Merged

Conversation

EttyKitty
Copy link
Collaborator

@EttyKitty EttyKitty commented Jan 4, 2025

Description of changes

  • Fixes a couple of missed trait checks with old methods, causing crashes.
  • Minor refactor to if/else checks, for clarity.

Reasons for changes

  • Got a couple of crashes without this.

Related links

How have you tested your changes?

  • Compile
  • New game
  • Next turn
  • Space Travel
  • Ground Battle

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Fix crashes caused by missing trait checks with old methods.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request fixes a couple of edge cases that caused crashes due to missing trait checks. It also includes a minor refactor of if/else statements for improved clarity.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Replaced direct string comparisons with calls to scr_has_adv()
  • Uses the function scr_has_adv() to check for advantages like "Enemy: Eldar", "Ambushers", and "Crafters" instead of directly checking string values in obj_ini.strin.
  • Simplifies the logic and makes the code more readable and maintainable.
scripts/scr_dialogue/scr_dialogue.gml
objects/obj_controller/Create_0.gml
objects/obj_ground_mission/Alarm_4.gml
objects/obj_ground_mission/Alarm_5.gml
scripts/scr_initialize_custom/scr_initialize_custom.gml
Refactored if/else statements
  • Improved the structure and readability of if/else statements within the scr_dialogue function.
  • No changes in functionality, only improved code clarity.
scripts/scr_dialogue/scr_dialogue.gml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@github-actions github-actions bot added the PR: Fix This is a fix for a bug label Jan 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @EttyKitty - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@EttyKitty EttyKitty merged commit ec535b5 into Adeptus-Dominus:release/0.10.0.0 Jan 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@EttyKitty EttyKitty deleted the bugfix/trait-checking branch January 4, 2025 19:31
KRdaMystic pushed a commit to KRdaMystic/ChapterMaster that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: Fix This is a fix for a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant