Update rustc #908
Merged
Update rustc #908
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A small rustc bump to catch rust-lang/rust#148719 (left for a future PR). The main difficulty was rust-lang/rust#148151 which reworks how
offset_ofis represented and revealed that we didn't support inline consts properly. Most interesting changes are on the hax side.Of note is that
size_ofandalign_ofhave become intrinsics instead ofNullOps. Alsooffset_ofmight be better as aConstantExprKindthan aNullOp. I'm leaving all that to a future cleanup of builtin ops.ci: use AeneasVerif/aeneas#651
ci: use AeneasVerif/eurydice#351