Map blueprint ontology to CL names

[allyhawkins]

Purpose/implementation Section

Please link to the GitHub issue that this pull request addresses.

Closes #979

What is the goal of this pull request?

Here I am adding a column that maps the ontology ID in BlueprintEncodeData to the CL name found in the cell type ontology.

Briefly describe the general approach you took to achieve this goal.

• I updated the script that creates the consensus reference table to include a column for the mapped name blueprint_annotation_cl. This also means a huge diff for this file since it includes a new column.
• Since the reference that we have doesn't have every combination of assignments (due to size constraints), I also map the IDs in the script to combine all tables and add consensus labels. Ultimately, I chose to remove the blueprint_annotation_fine column altogether and just use the blueprint_annotation_cl column.
• I then updated the readme to reflect this change.

Author checklists

Check all those that apply.
Note that you may find it easier to check off these items after the pull request is actually filed.

Analysis module and review

• This analysis module uses the analysis template and has the expected directory structure.
• The analysis module README.md has been updated to reflect code changes in this pull request.
• The analytical code is documented and contains comments.
• Any results and/or plots this code produces have been added to your S3 bucket for review.

Reproducibility checklist

• Code in this pull request has been added to the GitHub Action workflow that runs this module.
• The dependencies required to run the code in this pull request have been added to the analysis module Dockerfile.
• If applicable, the dependencies required to run the code in this pull request have been added to the analysis module conda environment.yml file.
• If applicable, R package dependencies required to run the code in this pull request have been added to the analysis module renv.lock file.

[jashapiro]

LGTM

[allyhawkins]

I'm going to cancel the workflow run for this module since the changes I just had to merge in from main aren't relevant.