Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #1518 from alo7lika/TEST
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)Algorithm in Machine Learning
  • Loading branch information
pankaj-bind authored Oct 31, 2024
2 parents c1237a9 + fd7335b commit 4920116
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 178 additions and 0 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>

#define TRAJECTORY_LENGTH 100
#define NUM_TRAJECTORIES 10
#define CLIP_EPSILON 0.2
#define LEARNING_RATE 0.001
#define GAMMA 0.99
#define LAMBDA 0.95

// Placeholder functions for the neural network
double policy(double state) {
// Simple placeholder function for policy
return state * 0.1;
}

double value_function(double state) {
// Simple placeholder function for value function
return state * 0.5;
}

// Calculate advantage function using Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE)
double calculate_advantage(double rewards[], double values[], int t) {
double advantage = 0.0;
double discount = 1.0;
for (int k = t; k < TRAJECTORY_LENGTH; ++k) {
advantage += discount * (rewards[k] + GAMMA * values[k + 1] - values[k]);
discount *= GAMMA * LAMBDA;
}
return advantage;
}

// Policy update with clipping
double clipped_objective(double ratio, double advantage) {
double clip_value = fmax(1 - CLIP_EPSILON, fmin(1 + CLIP_EPSILON, ratio));
return fmin(ratio * advantage, clip_value * advantage);
}

// Main PPO loop
void PPO() {
double states[TRAJECTORY_LENGTH];
double actions[TRAJECTORY_LENGTH];
double rewards[TRAJECTORY_LENGTH];
double values[TRAJECTORY_LENGTH];
double advantages[TRAJECTORY_LENGTH];
double returns[TRAJECTORY_LENGTH];

for (int episode = 0; episode < NUM_TRAJECTORIES; ++episode) {
// Simulate data collection
for (int t = 0; t < TRAJECTORY_LENGTH; ++t) {
states[t] = (double)t; // Placeholder state
actions[t] = policy(states[t]); // Take action according to policy
rewards[t] = -fabs(actions[t]); // Placeholder reward function
values[t] = value_function(states[t]);
}

// Calculate returns and advantages
for (int t = 0; t < TRAJECTORY_LENGTH; ++t) {
returns[t] = rewards[t] + GAMMA * values[t + 1];
advantages[t] = calculate_advantage(rewards, values, t);
}

// Update policy using clipped objective
for (int t = 0; t < TRAJECTORY_LENGTH; ++t) {
double old_policy = policy(states[t]);
double ratio = policy(states[t]) / old_policy; // Placeholder policy ratio
double objective = clipped_objective(ratio, advantages[t]);

// Simple gradient update (mock update, as no neural network here)
// In practice, we would use neural network gradients
double policy_update = LEARNING_RATE * objective;
printf("Policy updated for state %f with value %f\n", states[t], policy_update);
}
}
}

int main() {
PPO();
return 0;
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) Algorithm in Machine Learning

---

## Description

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is an advanced reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm designed to help agents learn optimal policies in complex environments. Developed by OpenAI, PPO strikes a balance between complexity and performance, making it popular for applications in areas such as game playing, robotics, and autonomous control systems. PPO is a policy-gradient method that improves the stability and efficiency of training by using clipped objectives, allowing it to find near-optimal policies while preventing overly large updates that can destabilize learning.

---

## Key Features

1. **Policy Optimization with Clipping**: PPO restricts large policy updates by applying a clipping mechanism to the objective function, ensuring stable learning without drastic changes that could harm the performance.
2. **Surrogate Objective Function**: PPO optimizes a surrogate objective that includes a penalty for large deviations from the old policy, reducing the risk of unstable updates.
3. **On-Policy Learning**: PPO is primarily an on-policy algorithm, meaning it learns from data generated by the current policy, which improves sample efficiency and stability.
4. **Trust Region-Free**: Unlike traditional Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO), PPO avoids complex constraints and uses simpler clipping methods for policy updates, making it computationally efficient.
5. **Entropy Bonus**: The algorithm incorporates an entropy bonus to encourage exploration, helping the agent avoid local optima.

---

## Problem Definition

In reinforcement learning, an agent aims to learn an optimal policy, \( \pi(a|s) \), that maximizes expected cumulative rewards over time. The main challenges in policy optimization include:

1. **Stability**: Large updates to policies can lead to drastic performance drops.
2. **Sample Efficiency**: Efficient use of data is crucial, especially in complex environments with high-dimensional state and action spaces.
3. **Exploration vs. Exploitation**: The agent needs to balance exploring new actions with exploiting known, rewarding actions.

PPO addresses these challenges by refining the policy-gradient update approach through a clipped objective function, which stabilizes learning by controlling the impact of each update.

---

## Algorithm Review

### Steps of the PPO Algorithm:

1. **Initialize** the policy network \( \pi_{\theta} \) and the value network \( V_{\phi} \) with random weights \( \theta \) and \( \phi \).
2. **Generate Trajectories**: Using the current policy \( \pi_{\theta} \), generate multiple trajectories (i.e., sequences of states, actions, and rewards) by interacting with the environment.
3. **Compute Rewards-to-Go**: For each state in a trajectory, compute the cumulative rewards-to-go, also known as the return, to approximate the true value function.
4. **Compute Advantages**: Calculate the advantage function, which estimates how much better an action is than the average action in a given state. PPO often uses Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE) for a more stable advantage computation.
5. **Update the Policy with Clipping**: Use the surrogate objective function with a clipping factor to update the policy. The objective is given by:

\[
L^{\text{CLIP}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E} \left[ \min \left( r_t(\theta) \hat{A}_t, \, \text{clip}\left( r_t(\theta), 1 - \epsilon, 1 + \epsilon \right) \hat{A}_t \right) \right]
\]

where:

- \( r_t(\theta) = \frac{\pi_{\theta}(a|s)}{\pi_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(a|s)} \): the probability ratio between the new policy and the old policy.
- \( \epsilon \): the clipping threshold.
- \( \hat{A}_t \): the advantage function, which estimates the relative benefit of taking action \( a \) in state \( s \) compared to the average action in that state.

6. **Update the Value Network**: Minimize the difference between the estimated values \( V_{\phi}(s) \) and the computed returns for more accurate value predictions.
7. **Repeat**: Iterate steps 2-6 until convergence or a pre-defined number of episodes.

---

## Time Complexity

The time complexity of PPO mainly depends on:

1. **Policy Network Forward Pass**: The forward pass complexity is given by:

\[
O(N \cdot T \cdot P)
\]

where:
- \( N \): number of trajectories.
- \( T \): trajectory length.
- \( P \): complexity of the policy network.

2. **Gradient Update**: PPO typically requires several updates per episode, leading to a training complexity of:

\[
O(E \cdot N \cdot T \cdot P)
\]

where \( E \) is the number of episodes.

Overall, PPO has lower time complexity than more constrained methods like TRPO but requires more samples than off-policy algorithms like DDPG.

---

## Applications

PPO is widely used in applications that benefit from robust policy optimization, including:

1. **Robotics**: Control tasks for robotic arms and autonomous agents.
2. **Gaming**: Game AI that needs to learn complex behaviors in environments like chess, Go, and various video games.
3. **Autonomous Vehicles**: Path planning and decision-making systems in self-driving cars.

---

## Conclusion

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is a powerful reinforcement learning algorithm designed to stabilize the policy-gradient update process. Its clipped objective function provides a balance between exploration and exploitation, which improves stability, data efficiency, and convergence speed in various reinforcement learning applications.

0 comments on commit 4920116

Please sign in to comment.