-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade all actions to remove warnings #213
Upgrade all actions to remove warnings #213
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several GitHub Actions workflow files and the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/create_release.yml (1)
27-28
: Good improvement: Prevents accidental overwrite of release notes.The addition of
omitBodyDuringUpdate: true
is a good practice that preserves manually edited release notes during updates.Consider documenting this behavior in your release process documentation to inform contributors about:
- The preservation of manual edits
- When and how to properly update release notes
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/actions/build/action.yml
(2 hunks).github/workflows/archive_build.yml
(2 hunks).github/workflows/create_release.yml
(2 hunks).github/workflows/run_tests.yml
(2 hunks).gitignore
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/archive_build.yml
- .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/actions/build/action.yml (2)
Line range hint 10-16
: Verify compatibility with actions/cache@v4.
The upgrade to actions/cache@v4 aligns with the PR objective to update actions. The cache configuration looks correct, maintaining the same path and key structure.
Let's verify the breaking changes in v4:
21-21
: Verify compatibility with sonarcloud-github-c-cpp@v3.
The upgrade to sonarcloud-github-c-cpp@v3 aligns with the PR objective to update actions.
Let's verify the breaking changes in v3:
.github/workflows/create_release.yml (2)
35-35
: LGTM: Safe minor version upgrade for documentation generation.
The upgrade to DenverCoder1/doxygen-github-pages-action@v1.3.1
is a minor version bump that maintains compatibility with existing configuration.
12-12
: LGTM: Checkout action upgrade is safe.
The upgrade to actions/checkout@v4
aligns with the PR objectives and maintains compatibility with the existing configuration.
Let's verify other workflow files are consistently using v4:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Checkout action version is consistently used across workflows
All GitHub Actions workflow files are using actions/checkout@v4
:
.github/workflows/create_release.yml
.github/workflows/archive_build.yml
.github/workflows/run_tests.yml
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent checkout action versions across workflows
# Expect: All checkout actions should use v4
rg -l 'uses:\s*actions/checkout@' .github/workflows/
rg 'uses:\s*actions/checkout@v\d' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 423
.github/workflows/run_tests.yml (2)
14-14
: LGTM: Checkout action upgrade looks good.
The upgrade to actions/checkout@v4
is a safe change as this workflow uses basic checkout features that are unchanged in v4.
23-23
: Verify cache behavior after upgrade.
The upgrade to actions/cache@v4
aligns with the PR objectives. While the current cache configuration looks compatible, it's good practice to verify cache hits after the upgrade.
✅ Verification successful
Cache configuration is consistent and properly upgraded
The verification shows that:
- All instances of
actions/cache@
have been upgraded to v4 - Cache key patterns are properly configured and use appropriate file patterns:
- Test cache uses C++ test files hash
- Build cache uses platformio.ini hash with OS-specific prefix
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify cache configuration across workflows for consistency
# Look for any other cache actions to ensure consistent versioning
# Test 1: Check if all cache actions are upgraded to v4
echo "Checking for any remaining v3 cache actions..."
rg -l "actions/cache@v3" .github/
# Test 2: Verify cache key patterns are consistent
echo "Checking cache key patterns..."
rg "key: \${{ hashFiles" .github/
Length of output: 350
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check cache configurations
# Check all cache action usage across workflows
echo "Checking all cache action versions..."
rg -p "uses: actions/cache@" .github/
# Check cache key patterns with proper escaping
echo "Checking cache key patterns..."
rg -p "key: .*hashFiles" .github/
Length of output: 558
Fixes #210 and a bunch of other GitHub Actions warnings by upgrading used actions to their latest major version.
Also cleaned the
.gitignore
file a bit as Git warned me thatbuild/action.yml
was being ignored because of an overreaching ignore rule.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
.gitignore
to better manage development environment files and directories.