Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: v3 issues #14704

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: v3 issues #14704

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mlqn
Copy link
Contributor

@mlqn mlqn commented Feb 18, 2025

Description

Fixed v3 issues.

I noticed that v3 has several other bugs (e.g., the preview not refreshing, errors in the console, etc.), but I think it’s best to prioritize #14428

Related Issue(s)

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced data processing reliability to reduce potential runtime issues.
  • Style
    • Adjusted spacing in the linked data model interface for a cleaner, more consistent layout.
  • New Features
    • Introduced a hidden default option in dropdown menus to improve selection behavior and user experience.

@mlqn mlqn linked an issue Feb 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adjusts backend and frontend logic. In the backend, the GetModelName method now validates candidates based solely on a non-null ClassRef, and it initializes certain collections to avoid null references. In the frontend, a CSS rule is modified by removing a margin, and a hidden default option is added in a dropdown component.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
backend/src/.../AppDevelopmentService.cs Modified the GetModelName method to check only for a non-null ClassRef (removing the TaskId check) and introduced empty array initializations for layoutNames and referencesToDelete.
frontend/.../EditDataModelBindings.module.css,
frontend/.../EditTextResourceBindings.tsx
Removed the margin-top property from the .linkedDataModelContainer class in the CSS file and added a hidden <option value='' hidden></option> in the StudioNativeSelect dropdown component.

Suggested labels

kind/bug, area/process, area/ui-editor, team/studio-domain1, skip-manual-testing

Suggested reviewers

  • ErlingHauan
  • Jondyr

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64b8511 and d8ec9ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • backend/src/Designer/Services/Implementation/AppDevelopmentService.cs (1 hunks)
  • frontend/packages/ux-editor-v3/src/components/config/editModal/EditDataModelBindings.module.css (0 hunks)
  • frontend/packages/ux-editor-v3/src/components/config/editModal/EditTextResourceBindings.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • frontend/packages/ux-editor-v3/src/components/config/editModal/EditDataModelBindings.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • frontend/packages/ux-editor-v3/src/components/config/editModal/EditTextResourceBindings.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/src/Designer/Services/Implementation/AppDevelopmentService.cs (3)

227-227: LGTM! Simplified model selection logic.

The condition for selecting a data type has been simplified to only check for a non-null ClassRef, which is sufficient for this use case.


168-168: LGTM! Modern C# syntax for array initialization.

Using C# 12's collection expression syntax for initializing the array. This ensures layoutNames is properly initialized and prevents null reference issues.


612-612: LGTM! Modern C# syntax for list initialization.

Using C# 12's collection expression syntax for initializing the list. This ensures referencesToDelete is properly initialized and prevents null reference issues.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added solution/studio/designer Issues related to the Altinn Studio Designer solution. backend frontend labels Feb 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.76%. Comparing base (f2a6c5c) to head (d8ec9ce).
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #14704   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.76%   95.76%           
=======================================
  Files        1914     1914           
  Lines       24947    24947           
  Branches     2855     2855           
=======================================
  Hits        23890    23890           
  Misses        799      799           
  Partials      258      258           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mlqn mlqn marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend frontend solution/studio/designer Issues related to the Altinn Studio Designer solution.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

v3 issues
2 participants