Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update AngleSharp and AngleSharp.Css #38

Conversation

SimonCropp
Copy link

so the nugets r all in sync

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jun 26, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@egil
Copy link
Collaborator

egil commented Jun 27, 2023

Yeah I've been waiting for the css package to move to V1. Looks like we're close.

Copy link
Collaborator

@egil egil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No reason not to go to V1 here too

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Egil Hansen <egil@assimilated.dk>
@egil
Copy link
Collaborator

egil commented Jun 29, 2023

Hmm now that I think about it, I do not think we can push a none-preview version out which depends on preview packages? so perhaps lets version it as 1.0.0-preview until CSS package is v1. @FlorianRappl what do you think?

@FlorianRappl
Copy link
Contributor

Well we could do it (publish something that is based on a preview) but I fully agree that waiting for AngleSharp.Css 1.0.0 is the right move!

@egil
Copy link
Collaborator

egil commented Oct 14, 2024

I keep running into issues with wanting to use AngleSharp v1 and not being able to, so pushed an updated that ignores the preview release of css. Diffing doesn't need all css features, in realilty just the parsing of style attributes content, so I feel ok with this.

@egil egil closed this Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants