Skip to content

Remove content sourced from external repository#26

Merged
AvdLee merged 2 commits intomainfrom
add-acknowledgments
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

Remove content sourced from external repository#26
AvdLee merged 2 commits intomainfrom
add-acknowledgments

Conversation

@AvdLee
Copy link
Owner

@AvdLee AvdLee commented Feb 25, 2026

We used several inputs for improving this skill, but we lacked proper permissions. This PR removes anything that came from Paul's SwiftAgents repository.

  • Delete modern-apis.md and text-formatting.md reference files
  • Remove related sections from SKILL.md (modern API rules, checklist items, quick reference table)
  • Clean up image-optimization.md, scroll-patterns.md, and layout-best-practices.md
  • Update AGENTS.md, README.md, and plugin metadata to reflect removals

- Delete modern-apis.md and text-formatting.md reference files
- Remove related sections from SKILL.md (modern API rules, checklist items, quick reference table)
- Clean up image-optimization.md, scroll-patterns.md, and layout-best-practices.md
- Update AGENTS.md, README.md, and plugin metadata to reflect removals
@AvdLee AvdLee self-assigned this Feb 25, 2026
@AvdLee AvdLee merged commit c1f9737 into main Feb 25, 2026
1 check passed
@AvdLee AvdLee deleted the add-acknowledgments branch February 25, 2026 14:09
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 995eff23f1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

// Good - logic in testable model (iOS 16 and earlier)
@MainActor
final class LoginViewModel: ObservableObject {
final class AuthService: ObservableObject {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore main-actor isolation on ObservableObject example

This example now declares AuthService without @MainActor even though the view launches login() from a Task; in SwiftUI code copied from this pattern, any @Published writes after an await can resume off the main actor and trigger background-thread publishing violations at runtime. Since this reference is meant to provide correct defaults for iOS 16-era ObservableObject usage, the sample should remain main-actor isolated (or explicitly call out the required isolation).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant