Add Priority Types For Push

[GCRA101]

NOTE: Depends on

BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit#480

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #390

BHoM_Adapter now equipped with a new attribute PropertyTypes defining priority order for the push of objects into software packages in addition to DependencyTypes. This change has been required due to the requirements from software packages like ETABS to push objects following a specific hierarchy.

Test files

Video Demonstration - Issue
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:v:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Push%20Levels%20Issue.mp4?csf=1&web=1&e=7cEacd
Video Demonstration - Solution
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:v:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Push%20Levels%20Sorted.mp4?csf=1&web=1&e=cDUbje
Json File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/sites/BHoM/_layouts/15/download.aspx?UniqueId=aa695dbddee44123b35aecc6843d658a&e=mvnMou
Grasshopper File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Test%20Script.gh?csf=1&web=1&e=Lzfzec
Etabs File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Test%20ETABS%20Model.EDB?csf=1&web=1&e=lj7JY7

Changelog

• Added PriorityTypes attribute as dictionary associating priority number to each type of object to push
• Added HandlePriorities attribute allowing Adapters to sort by priorities if required (e.g. ETABS)
• Added PriorityComparer defining criteria for sorting objects based on priority
• Added GetPrioritySortedObjects to sort objects based on priority and using the PriorityComparer

[IsakNaslundBh]

Good initial work @GCRA101 , but I think this can be simplified quite a bit.

Also, think this should be used for exceptional cases where the dependency sorting is not enough so you don't have to add all types in to the priority types, but just the ones that really needs to go before everything else, and is not already handled by the dependency sorting.

Please see comments.

[alelom]

Had a look at this PR and the ETABS one. Great work @GCRA101 ! 🚀
I agree with the changes suggested by @IsakNaslundBh .

[GCRA101]

@IsakNaslundBh, @alelom,
thanks again for the comments.
I've incorporated them in the latest commit 3587c92

Requested changes now addressed and happy with this from a code perspective. Dismissing my request for change review

[IsakNaslundBh]

Happy with this from a code perspective now, and have dismissed my review. @Chrisshort92 Could you please assist in testing this from a functionality point of view?