CVE_Prioritizer is a powerful tool that helps you prioritize vulnerability patching by combining
CVSS, EPSS,
CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities and VulnCheck's community resources (
NVD++,
KEV).
It provides valuable insights into the likelihood of exploitation and the
potential impact of vulnerabilities on your information system.
CVE_Prioritizer leverages the correlation between CVSS and EPSS scores to enhance vulnerability remediation efforts. While CVSS captures the fundamental properties of a vulnerability, EPSS offers data-driven threat information, enabling you to better prioritize patching.
The team at FIRST did an amazing job explaining why one would want to combine CVSS and EPSS in their EPSS User Guide. The following material has been extracted from that document.
The figure below shows the correlation between EPSS and CVSS scores based on data from 05-16-2021. Recall that EPSS produces prediction scores between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%) where higher scores suggest higher probability of exploit. Each dot represents one or more vulnerabilities (CVEs). Some vulnerabilities are labeled for illustrative purposes.
First, observe how most vulnerabilities are concentrated near the bottom of the plot, and only a small percent of vulnerabilities have EPSS scores above 50% (0.5). While there is some correlation between EPSS and CVSS scores, overall, this plot provides suggestive evidence that attackers are not only targeting vulnerabilities that produce the greatest impact, or are necessarily easier to exploit (such as for example, an unauthenticated remote code execution).
This is an important finding because it refutes a common assumption that attackers are only looking for (and using) the most severe vulnerabilities. And so, how then can a network defender choose among these vulnerabilities when deciding what to patch first?
CVSS is a useful tool for capturing the fundamental properties of a vulnerability, but it needs to be used in combination with data-driven threat information, like EPSS, in order to better prioritize vulnerability remediation efforts.
For the sake of discussion, consider the diagram below, which has been annotated to generally illustrate vulnerability prioritization.
- Vulnerabilities in the bottom left represent those that have both a lower probability of being exploited, and would incur a lower severity impact to the information system, and can therefore be de-prioritized.
- Vulnerabilities in the upper left quadrant may be more likely to be exploited, but, on their own, would not critically impact the information system. (Further research, however, should be conducted in order to better understand how these sorts of vulnerabilities may be used in a chained attack.)
- Vulnerabilities in the bottom right represent those that, while may severely impact the information system, are much less likely to be exploited, relative to others, but should still be watched in the event that the threat landscape changes.
- Vulnerabilities in the upper right quadrant, on the other hand, are the most critical kinds of vulnerabilities which are both more likely to be exploited, and could fully compromise the information system, and should therefore be patched first.
This decision strategy as described above emphasizes the tremendous capability of EPSS. A network defender who has typically had to address thousands or tens of thousands of exposed vulnerabilities, is now able to spend fewer resources, to patch more vulnerabilities that are much more likely to be exploited. This capability to differentiate among vulnerabilities has never before been possible.
We have refined the prioritization thresholds based on FIRST's recommendations and our own experience. Here's an overview:
- We include CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, giving priority to CVEs found in KEV.
- The CVSS Threshold is set to 6.0, representing the weighted average CVSS Score from CVE Details.
- The EPSS Threshold is set to 0.2, focusing on vulnerabilities with higher relevance above this threshold.
This approach categorizes vulnerabilities into five priority levels, allowing you to allocate resources more effectively.
Priority | Description |
---|---|
Priority 1+ | CVEs found in CISA's KEV |
Priority 1 | CVEs in the Upper Right Quadrant |
Priority 2 | CVEs in the Lower Right Quadrant |
Priority 3 | CVEs in the Upper Left Quadrant |
Priority 4 | CVEs in the Lower Left Quadrant |
Below is a modified version of FIRST's recommendation after applying our own approach.
Note: You can define your own thresholds when running the tool to tailor the results to your organization's risk appetite.
git clone https://github.com/TURROKS/CVE_Prioritizer.git
cd ./CVE_Prioritizer/
pip3 install -r requirements.txt
To use CVE_Prioritizer effectively, follow these steps:
- Request your API keys to avoid public rate limits.
- Select your CVE Data source
- NIST NVD: This is the default source.
- NVD++: VulnCheck's NVD2 solves NIST's API challenges with a reliable, persistent
connection to their Community NVD 2.0 API that operates at machine speed use
-vc
or--vulncheck
to select this source. - VUNLCHECK KEV: VulnCheck also provides a list of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities for free to the community.
user
-vck
orvulnchek_kev
to select this source (ONLY WORKS WITH NVD++).
- Choose one of the following input methods:
- Single CVE: Use the
-c
or--cve
flags followed by the CVE ID. - List of CVEs: Provide a comma-separated list of CVEs using the
-l
flag. - File with CVEs: Import a file containing CVE IDs (one per line) using the
-f
flag.
- Single CVE: Use the
- Tailor the output according to your needs:
- Use the
-v
or--verbose
flags for detailed information, including EPSS Score, CVSS Base Score, CVSS Version, CVSS Severity, and CISA KEV status. - Define custom thresholds using the
--cvss
and/or--epss
flags to align the results with your organization's risk appetite. - Define the number of concurrent threads by using the
-t
or--threads
flags, the default and recommended number is 100 to avoid API rate limitations.
- Use the
python3 cve_prioritizer.py -c CVE-2020-29127
python3 cve_prioritizer.py -l CVE-2020-29127 CVE-2017-16885
python3 cve_prioritizer.py -f ~\Desktop\CheckThisCVEs.txt
CVE_Prioritizer provides flexible output options to suit your preferences. By default, it provides a summary of results, including the CVE-ID and its priority. However, you can enable verbose mode to obtain additional information.
Here are the available output options:
Summary Results (default): Provides a concise summary, including the CVE-ID and its priority.
Verbose Mode: Enables detailed output with the following information for each CVE:
- EPSS Score
- CVSS Base Score
- CVSS Version
- CVSS Severity
- CISA KEV Status (TRUE or FALSE)
CSV File
You can save the results to a CSV file by using the -o
or --output
flags
python3 cve_prioritizer.py -c CVE-2020-4343 -o ~/Desktop/results.csv
This outputs the verbose results independently of the terminal output that you use.
CVE Trends
You can also utilize the -d
or --demo
flags to retrieve the Top 10 Trending CVEs of the last 7 days from CVE Trends.
This feature fetches real-time information from the CVE Trends website.
The provided data gives you insights into the most trending CVEs, enabling you to stay informed about the latest vulnerabilities.
Happy Patching!
Please note that while this tool uses the NVD API, it is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.