Refacto status publication #421
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fufeck
force-pushed
the
fufeck_refacto-status-publication
branch
from
9a54573 to
6968cff
Compare
MaGOs92
reviewed
Dec 22, 2023
|
Tu utilises Nest pour run la migration? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PROBLEME
Le system de publication est un peu compliqué a comprendre et est perturbant lorsqu'il y a une mise a jour programmé et pas d'habilitation.
FONCTIONNALITEE
READY_TO_PUBLISH, la première publication se fait a partir du statusDRAFTWAITING_HABILITATIONqui est set lors du cronsyncOutdatedsi le status.sync estOUTDATEDmais que l'habilitation n'est plus valide.