Fix pydantic serialization warnings #16299
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Title
Fix pydantic serialization warnings
Relevant issues
Fixes #11759
Pre-Submission checklist
Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR
tests/litellm/directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see detailsmake test-unitPre-existing test failures:
4 Pre-existing test failures (unrelated to this PR):
All 4 failures are due to missing optional dependencies or missing model cost data, not related to this Pydantic serialization fix.
Type
🐛 Bug Fix
✅ Test
Changes
This PR fixes Pydantic serialization warnings (issue #11759) by using
Field(exclude=True)instead ofdel self.fieldin LiteLLM'sMessageandChoicesclasses, and removes the global warning filter that was masking the issue.The Problem: LiteLLM deletes Pydantic model fields after initialization, which breaks Pydantic's field tracking and generates warnings. A global warning filter was added to suppress these warnings, but it affects all code in the process—including user code.
The Fix:
Field(exclude=True)to fields inlitellm/types/utils.pyand removeddelstatementslitellm/llms/meta_llama/chat/transformation.pySee #11759 (comment) for full context