Skip to content

Comments

Single node ES instance#102

Open
egorksv wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/single-node
Open

Single node ES instance#102
egorksv wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/single-node

Conversation

@egorksv
Copy link
Contributor

@egorksv egorksv commented Jan 2, 2021

  • No load balancers
  • No autoscaling
  • Output set to single node IP address

@egorksv egorksv requested a review from synhershko January 2, 2021 07:31
@egorksv egorksv force-pushed the feature/single-node branch 4 times, most recently from 2204189 to bd1eaf6 Compare January 7, 2021 11:35
- No load balancers
- No autoscaling
- Output set to single node IP address
fixed issue with singlenode instance being provisioned in clustered mode
Single-node network interface attachment to ensure connectivity without load balancer
updated gitignore

Kibana image

restored file

file restored
@egorksv egorksv force-pushed the feature/single-node branch from bd1eaf6 to 9faaeb8 Compare January 7, 2021 11:37
@synhershko synhershko requested a review from tsimonyan January 16, 2021 19:10
count = local.singlenode_mode ? 0 : 1

name = "${var.environment}-${var.es_cluster}-alb"
internal = ! var.public_facing
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The variable public_facing is not accounted anymore for single-nodes.

#!/bin/bash
set +e

echo "Testing AMI Builder if it works properly"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cleanup

})
}

resource "aws_network_interface" "single_node" {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has to be conditional, only created when singlenode_mode is true.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants