Skip to content

[WIP] Add collaboration and memory functions for sessions#6

Open
Copilot wants to merge 18 commits intomainfrom
copilot/add-collaboration-memory-functions
Open

[WIP] Add collaboration and memory functions for sessions#6
Copilot wants to merge 18 commits intomainfrom
copilot/add-collaboration-memory-functions

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Jan 27, 2026

Implementation Plan: Session Collaboration & Memory Functions

  • Create session registry system to track active sessions

    • Design session data structure with ID, timestamp, status, agent info
    • Implement session registration and discovery
    • Add session ping/heartbeat mechanism
  • Implement [COLLABORATION] function

    • Create collaboration protocol for inter-session communication
    • Add ability to discover other active sessions
    • Implement message passing between sessions
    • Add collaborative task coordination
  • Implement [MEMORY] function

    • Extend existing MEMORY.md system for session sharing
    • Create shared memory space for cross-session data
    • Add memory synchronization mechanism
    • Implement memory query/update APIs
  • Integration with existing systems

    • Connect to MCP server for session exposure
    • Integrate with signals system for session events
    • Add session tracking to dispatcher
    • Update .STATUS beacon with active sessions
  • Testing and validation

    • Test session discovery
    • Test memory sharing between sessions
    • Test collaboration messaging
    • Create interactive demo
    • Update main Bridge documentation
Original prompt

okay there are other sessions occuring right now cece can you see if you can ping their sessions so we can add a [COLLABORATION] and [MEMORY] function?


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI and others added 2 commits January 27, 2026 21:08
Co-authored-by: blackboxprogramming <118287761+blackboxprogramming@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: blackboxprogramming <118287761+blackboxprogramming@users.noreply.github.com>
@blackboxprogramming blackboxprogramming marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2026 11:03
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 31, 2026 11:03
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR introduces a full session management subsystem for the BlackRoad Bridge, including a registry for active sessions, a collaboration hub for inter-session messaging, a shared memory store, a CLI and demo, and MCP server tools to expose these capabilities, plus some runtime JSON artifacts under .sessions/.

Changes:

  • Add core session management library (sessions package) with SessionRegistry, CollaborationHub, and SharedMemory implementations, plus CLI, demo, and tests.
  • Integrate session management with the MCP server via new tools for registering/listing/pinging sessions, sending collaboration messages, and storing/querying shared memory.
  • Add a .STATUS updater script and commit current .sessions runtime data (active sessions, messages, and shared memory snapshots).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 20 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
prototypes/sessions/update_status.py Script to collect stats from the session registry/collab hub/shared memory and update a .STATUS beacon with active session info.
prototypes/sessions/test_sessions.py Ad-hoc test suite covering SessionRegistry, CollaborationHub, SharedMemory, and an integration workflow.
prototypes/sessions/setup.py Packaging metadata for the blackroad-sessions Python package and blackroad-sessions console entrypoint.
prototypes/sessions/sessions/registry.py Implements Session and SessionRegistry with JSON-backed storage and basic querying and statistics.
prototypes/sessions/sessions/memory.py Implements MemoryEntry and SharedMemory (JSON-backed shared key–value store with tagging, TTL, and search).
prototypes/sessions/sessions/collaboration.py Implements Message and CollaborationHub for inter-session messaging, broadcast, pinging, and conversation threading.
prototypes/sessions/sessions/cli.py Provides CLI commands for registering/listing/pinging/updating sessions, sending/broadcasting messages, querying memory, and displaying stats.
prototypes/sessions/sessions/__main__.py Enables python -m sessions to invoke the CLI main entrypoint.
prototypes/sessions/sessions/__init__.py Public package exports and version for the sessions package.
prototypes/sessions/demo.py Interactive demo script showcasing session discovery, collaboration, shared memory, and a full multi-agent workflow.
prototypes/sessions/README.md High-level documentation, quickstart, API examples, architecture, and CLI usage for the session management system.
prototypes/mcp-server/blackroad_mcp/server.py Extends the MCP server with session/collaboration/memory tools and lazy-loaded accessors to the new session subsystems.
.sessions/active_sessions.json JSON snapshot of current sessions as persisted by SessionRegistry.
.sessions/messages/recent_messages.json JSON log of recent collaboration messages.
.sessions/shared_memory/memory.json JSON snapshot of shared memory entries.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.


import sys
from pathlib import Path
from datetime import datetime
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 31, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Import of 'datetime' is not used.

Suggested change
from datetime import datetime

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3bed7181b7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 20 to 22
# Get bridge root
bridge_root = Path(__file__).parent.parent
status_file = bridge_root / ".STATUS"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Write .STATUS to the actual repo root

This script says it updates the bridge .STATUS beacon, but bridge_root is set to Path(__file__).parent.parent, which resolves to .../prototypes for prototypes/sessions/update_status.py. As a result it writes prototypes/.STATUS instead of the real repo-root .STATUS, leaving the actual beacon stale and creating a second status file. Running the script in its intended context won’t update the file other tools read.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +152 to +156
data = {
'entries': {
eid: entry.to_dict()
for eid, entry in self._entries.items()
},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Prevent shared memory writes from clobbering peers

Shared memory is supposed to be cross-session, but _save serializes self._entries to disk without reloading or merging, so any concurrent writer with a stale in‑memory snapshot will overwrite new entries from other sessions (“last writer wins”). If two sessions call memory.set(...) in separate processes, the second write drops the first session’s entry. Consider reloading/merging or using a file lock/append strategy before overwriting memory.json.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

blackboxprogramming and others added 3 commits February 27, 2026 12:27
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

Workflow Changes Detected

This PR modifies GitHub Actions workflows. Please ensure:

  • Workflow names are descriptive
  • Secrets are properly referenced
  • Triggers are appropriate
  • Jobs have appropriate permissions

Automated workflow review

blackboxprogramming and others added 11 commits February 27, 2026 12:28
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 25 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +389 to +395
def find_replies(msg_id: str):
replies = [m for m in self._messages if m.in_reply_to == msg_id]
for reply in replies:
thread.append(reply)
find_replies(reply.message_id)

find_replies(thread[-1].message_id)
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The recursive find_replies() function has no depth limit. If there's a circular reference in in_reply_to (due to a bug or corrupted data), this will cause infinite recursion and a stack overflow. Even without circular references, a very long conversation thread could hit Python's recursion limit.

Consider implementing this iteratively with a visited set to detect cycles, or adding a maximum depth parameter.

Suggested change
def find_replies(msg_id: str):
replies = [m for m in self._messages if m.in_reply_to == msg_id]
for reply in replies:
thread.append(reply)
find_replies(reply.message_id)
find_replies(thread[-1].message_id)
def find_replies_iter(start_msg_id: str):
"""
Iteratively find all replies starting from the given message id.
Uses a stack and a visited set to avoid recursion depth issues
and to prevent infinite loops in case of cycles.
"""
visited = set()
stack = [start_msg_id]
while stack:
current_id = stack.pop()
if current_id in visited:
continue
visited.add(current_id)
replies = [m for m in self._messages if m.in_reply_to == current_id]
for reply in replies:
thread.append(reply)
stack.append(reply.message_id)
# Preserve existing behavior: start from the last message in the thread
find_replies_iter(thread[-1].message_id)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +1 to +104
{
"entries": {
"c1e9fd53-77ac-4139-9d9b-1e9cca8c322f": {
"entry_id": "c1e9fd53-77ac-4139-9d9b-1e9cca8c322f",
"type": "state",
"key": "project_plan",
"value": {
"phase": "design",
"tasks": [
"api-design",
"database-schema",
"frontend-mockups"
],
"deadline": "2026-02-01"
},
"session_id": "cece-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.492758",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"project",
"active",
"design"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"f628f9f0-2488-412d-8080-2142d48aae5a": {
"entry_id": "f628f9f0-2488-412d-8080-2142d48aae5a",
"type": "task",
"key": "task_api-design",
"value": {
"status": "completed",
"owner": "agent-002",
"completed_at": "2026-01-27"
},
"session_id": "agent-002",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.492905",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"task",
"completed"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"9bedbbff-8385-4324-89ce-8a3dbd89772a": {
"entry_id": "9bedbbff-8385-4324-89ce-8a3dbd89772a",
"type": "state",
"key": "implementation_plan",
"value": {
"feature": "user-auth",
"steps": [
"design",
"implement",
"test",
"review"
]
},
"session_id": "planner-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.494364",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"plan",
"auth"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"baac04e5-3913-459d-851d-fe03887f5605": {
"entry_id": "baac04e5-3913-459d-851d-fe03887f5605",
"type": "state",
"key": "code_user-auth",
"value": {
"file": "auth.py",
"lines": 250,
"tests": "passing"
},
"session_id": "developer-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.495052",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"code",
"ready-for-review"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"5f0e106f-385c-4fdb-be39-ff23112215f3": {
"entry_id": "5f0e106f-385c-4fdb-be39-ff23112215f3",
"type": "decision",
"key": "review_user-auth",
"value": {
"status": "approved",
"issues": 0,
"suggestions": 2
},
"session_id": "reviewer-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.496007",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"review",
"approved"
],
"metadata": {}
}
},
"updated_at": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.496065"
} No newline at end of file
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Runtime-generated data files should not be committed to version control. Add .sessions/ to .gitignore.

Suggested change
{
"entries": {
"c1e9fd53-77ac-4139-9d9b-1e9cca8c322f": {
"entry_id": "c1e9fd53-77ac-4139-9d9b-1e9cca8c322f",
"type": "state",
"key": "project_plan",
"value": {
"phase": "design",
"tasks": [
"api-design",
"database-schema",
"frontend-mockups"
],
"deadline": "2026-02-01"
},
"session_id": "cece-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.492758",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"project",
"active",
"design"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"f628f9f0-2488-412d-8080-2142d48aae5a": {
"entry_id": "f628f9f0-2488-412d-8080-2142d48aae5a",
"type": "task",
"key": "task_api-design",
"value": {
"status": "completed",
"owner": "agent-002",
"completed_at": "2026-01-27"
},
"session_id": "agent-002",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.492905",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"task",
"completed"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"9bedbbff-8385-4324-89ce-8a3dbd89772a": {
"entry_id": "9bedbbff-8385-4324-89ce-8a3dbd89772a",
"type": "state",
"key": "implementation_plan",
"value": {
"feature": "user-auth",
"steps": [
"design",
"implement",
"test",
"review"
]
},
"session_id": "planner-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.494364",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"plan",
"auth"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"baac04e5-3913-459d-851d-fe03887f5605": {
"entry_id": "baac04e5-3913-459d-851d-fe03887f5605",
"type": "state",
"key": "code_user-auth",
"value": {
"file": "auth.py",
"lines": 250,
"tests": "passing"
},
"session_id": "developer-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.495052",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"code",
"ready-for-review"
],
"metadata": {}
},
"5f0e106f-385c-4fdb-be39-ff23112215f3": {
"entry_id": "5f0e106f-385c-4fdb-be39-ff23112215f3",
"type": "decision",
"key": "review_user-auth",
"value": {
"status": "approved",
"issues": 0,
"suggestions": 2
},
"session_id": "reviewer-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.496007",
"ttl": null,
"tags": [
"review",
"approved"
],
"metadata": {}
}
},
"updated_at": "2026-01-27T21:11:11.496065"
}
{}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +166 to +187
def _rebuild_indices(self):
"""Rebuild all indices."""
self._index_by_key.clear()
self._index_by_session.clear()
self._index_by_tag.clear()

for entry_id, entry in self._entries.items():
# Index by key
if entry.key not in self._index_by_key:
self._index_by_key[entry.key] = []
self._index_by_key[entry.key].append(entry_id)

# Index by session
if entry.session_id not in self._index_by_session:
self._index_by_session[entry.session_id] = []
self._index_by_session[entry.session_id].append(entry_id)

# Index by tags
for tag in entry.tags:
if tag not in self._index_by_tag:
self._index_by_tag[tag] = []
self._index_by_tag[tag].append(entry_id)
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The index rebuilding in _rebuild_indices() has O(n*m) complexity where n is the number of entries and m is the average number of tags per entry. For large memory stores, this could be slow. The method is called on every delete and after loading, potentially causing performance issues.

Consider incremental index updates rather than full rebuilds, or using a more efficient data structure for indexing.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
value={
"phase": "design",
"tasks": ["api-design", "database-schema", "frontend-mockups"],
"deadline": "2026-02-01"
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The deadline date "2026-02-01" in the demo data is in the past relative to the PR timestamp of "2026-01-27". While this is just demo data, it creates a confusing example where a project deadline has already passed at the time the code is being reviewed.

Consider using a future date or a relative date format in examples to avoid this confusion.

Suggested change
"deadline": "2026-02-01"
"deadline": "2026-12-31"

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +54 to +55
last_ping_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(self.last_ping.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
return datetime.utcnow() - last_ping_dt > timedelta(seconds=timeout_seconds)
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The timezone handling in is_stale() is inconsistent. The replace('Z', '+00:00') approach assumes the timestamp ends with 'Z', but datetime.utcnow().isoformat() doesn't add a 'Z' suffix. This could cause a ValueError when parsing timestamps. Additionally, comparing a naive datetime (from datetime.utcnow()) with a timezone-aware datetime will raise a TypeError.

Consider making all datetime objects timezone-aware consistently, or use naive datetimes throughout.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.8",
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9",
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10",
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11",
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The package setup specifies Python 3.8+ compatibility but doesn't declare support for Python 3.12 or later versions. Given that the PR is dated 2026 and Python 3.12 was released in 2023, the classifiers should be updated to include newer Python versions that are likely being used.

Consider adding classifiers for Python 3.12 and possibly 3.13 if they're supported.

Suggested change
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11",
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11",
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12",
"Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13",

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +159 to +173
def _cleanup_stale(self, timeout_seconds: int = 300):
"""Remove stale sessions."""
stale = [
sid for sid, session in self._sessions.items()
if session.is_stale(timeout_seconds)
]

if not stale:
return

for sid in stale:
self._sessions[sid].status = SessionStatus.OFFLINE
# Don't delete, just mark offline for historical tracking

# Persist updated statuses so offline state is available across processes
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The _cleanup_stale() method modifies session statuses to OFFLINE but doesn't remove them from the registry. Over time, this will cause the registry to accumulate offline sessions, potentially leading to memory bloat and performance degradation. While clear_offline() exists to manually clean these up, there's no automatic cleanup mechanism.

Consider implementing a maximum retention policy for offline sessions or automatically removing sessions that have been offline for an extended period.

Suggested change
def _cleanup_stale(self, timeout_seconds: int = 300):
"""Remove stale sessions."""
stale = [
sid for sid, session in self._sessions.items()
if session.is_stale(timeout_seconds)
]
if not stale:
return
for sid in stale:
self._sessions[sid].status = SessionStatus.OFFLINE
# Don't delete, just mark offline for historical tracking
# Persist updated statuses so offline state is available across processes
def _cleanup_stale(
self,
timeout_seconds: int = 300,
offline_retention_seconds: int = 3600,
):
"""
Clean up stale sessions.
- Sessions that have been inactive for longer than `timeout_seconds`
are marked as OFFLINE.
- Sessions that are already OFFLINE and have remained stale for longer
than `offline_retention_seconds` are removed from the registry.
"""
# Sessions that have gone stale but are not yet marked offline
stale_to_offline = [
sid
for sid, session in self._sessions.items()
if session.is_stale(timeout_seconds)
and session.status is not SessionStatus.OFFLINE
]
# Sessions that have been offline for longer than the retention period
offline_to_delete = [
sid
for sid, session in self._sessions.items()
if session.status is SessionStatus.OFFLINE
and session.is_stale(offline_retention_seconds)
]
if not stale_to_offline and not offline_to_delete:
return
# Mark newly stale sessions as offline
for sid in stale_to_offline:
self._sessions[sid].status = SessionStatus.OFFLINE
# Remove long-offline sessions to prevent unbounded growth
for sid in offline_to_delete:
del self._sessions[sid]
# Persist updated registry so status and removals are visible across processes

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +174 to +179
def _save_messages(self):
"""Save recent messages to disk."""
messages_file = self.messages_path / "recent_messages.json"

# Keep only recent messages (last 100)
recent = self._messages[-100:]
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The message storage keeps only the last 100 messages in _save_messages(), but the in-memory _messages list can grow unbounded during runtime. If many messages are exchanged before the process restarts, this could lead to memory issues.

Consider also limiting the in-memory list size, or implementing a circular buffer to prevent unbounded growth.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +202 to +259
def set(
self,
session_id: str,
key: str,
value: Any,
type: MemoryType = MemoryType.STATE,
ttl: Optional[int] = None,
tags: Optional[List[str]] = None,
metadata: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
) -> MemoryEntry:
"""
Store a value in shared memory.

Args:
session_id: Session storing the value
key: Memory key
value: Value to store
type: Type of memory entry
ttl: Time to live in seconds (None = forever)
tags: Tags for searching
metadata: Additional metadata

Returns:
The created MemoryEntry
"""
import uuid

entry = MemoryEntry(
entry_id=str(uuid.uuid4()),
type=type,
key=key,
value=value,
session_id=session_id,
timestamp=datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
ttl=ttl,
tags=tags or [],
metadata=metadata or {},
)

self._entries[entry.entry_id] = entry

# Update indices
if key not in self._index_by_key:
self._index_by_key[key] = []
self._index_by_key[key].append(entry.entry_id)

if session_id not in self._index_by_session:
self._index_by_session[session_id] = []
self._index_by_session[session_id].append(entry.entry_id)

for tag in entry.tags:
if tag not in self._index_by_tag:
self._index_by_tag[tag] = []
self._index_by_tag[tag].append(entry.entry_id)

self._save()

return entry
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The shared memory system allows any session to store arbitrary data under any key without validation or sanitization. This creates several security concerns:

  • No input validation on the value parameter (could store malicious code/data)
  • No access control - any session can overwrite memory set by any other session
  • No size limits on values - could lead to disk exhaustion
  • No validation of memory types or tags

Consider adding validation, access controls, and size limits to prevent abuse.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +156 to +157
except Exception as e:
print(f"Warning: Could not save session registry: {e}")
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Catching broad exceptions and printing warnings can mask serious issues. If saving fails due to disk full, permission errors, or other problems, the system continues as if everything is fine. This means:

  • Sessions might think they're registered but aren't persisted
  • Messages could be lost silently
  • Memory updates might not be saved

Consider being more specific about which exceptions to catch, and potentially raise critical errors (like disk full) rather than silently continuing. Also add proper logging.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants