chore(js-ts): migrate AppInformation component to TypeScript

[devin-ai-integration]

chore(js-ts): migrate AppInformation component to TypeScript

Summary

Migrates app/components/Views/Settings/AppInformation/index.js from JavaScript to TypeScript (.tsx), as part of the ongoing JS→TS migration effort.

Key changes:

• Replaced PropTypes with TypeScript interfaces (AppInformationProps, AppInformationState)
• Typed navigation prop as NavigationProp<ParamListBase> (matching project convention)
• Added declare context: Theme for ThemeContext typing
• Typed createStyles parameter as Colors, and goTo parameters as string
• Converted require() image import to ES module import
• Removed two references to styles.links — this key never existed in the stylesheet, so it was always undefined at runtime. The <View> elements now simply have no style prop, which is functionally identical.
• Added @ts-expect-error in the test file to work around renderScreen accepting React.ComponentType<{}>, which conflicts with the now-typed required navigation prop (navigation is injected at runtime by Stack.Screen).

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

• Verify styles.links removal is safe: Confirm that the stylesheet truly never defined a links key and that no other mechanism injected this style. The original code had <View style={styles.links}> in two places, but createStyles only defines link (singular). Removal should be a no-op, but worth confirming.
• Snapshot test: The removal of style={styles.links} (which was undefined) from two <View> elements may or may not change the rendered snapshot. Run yarn jest app/components/Views/Settings/AppInformation/index.test.tsx --updateSnapshot if the snapshot needs regenerating, and verify the diff is trivial.
• declare context: Theme: The ThemeContext is created as React.createContext<any>(undefined), so context could technically be undefined. The code handles this with this.context.colors || mockTheme.colors, but the declared type doesn't reflect the undefined case. Verify this is acceptable given the existing pattern.

Notes

• Link to Devin run
• Requested by: @joao-cognition

---

[devin-ai-integration]

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

• Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
• Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

• Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 2 additional findings.