Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md to standalone without the cookbook #424

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024

Conversation

anton-seaice
Copy link
Collaborator

I attempted to update the readme to standalone better and make sense without the cookbook.

I didn't make any changes to the contributing.rst which needs some similar changes.

Contributes to #419

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated

To **Get Started** with the `cosima-cookbook`, clone this repository locally, probably best in your local space on one of the NCI HPC machines so you can have access to model output. The repository includes a bunch of examples with which you can begin to construct your own analysis code.
To **get started** with `cosima-recipes`, clone this repository in your local space on one of the NCI HPC machines so you can have access to model output. You should then be able to run these recipes through an [Australian Research Environment (ARE)](https://are.nci.org.au/) JupyterLab session running python. You need to join projects _hh5, xp65, ik11, cj50_ and _ol01_ to run the recipes and acccess the data analysed.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
To **get started** with `cosima-recipes`, clone this repository in your local space on one of the NCI HPC machines so you can have access to model output. You should then be able to run these recipes through an [Australian Research Environment (ARE)](https://are.nci.org.au/) JupyterLab session running python. You need to join projects _hh5, xp65, ik11, cj50_ and _ol01_ to run the recipes and acccess the data analysed.
To **get started** with `cosima-recipes`, clone this repository in your local space on one of the NCI HPC machines so you can have access to model output. You should then be able to run these recipes through an [Australian Research Environment (ARE)](https://are.nci.org.au/) JupyterLab session running python. You need to join projects `hh5`, `xp65`, `ik11`, `cj50` and `ol01` to run the recipes and acccess the data.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what if I italicise each project name individually? is that better

Copy link
Collaborator

@navidcy navidcy Jul 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You prefer italics? Go for it! I actually thought it was a mistaken rst syntax...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps we can add a link to https://my.nci.org.au/ where we say "You need to join projects...."?

README.md Outdated
@@ -20,14 +24,20 @@ Just raise [an issue](https://github.com/COSIMA/cosima-recipes/issues) explainin

## Contents

### [Tutorials](https://cosima-recipes.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials.html)
We are in the process of transition these recipes from using [cosima-cookbook](https://github.com/COSIMA/cosima-cookbook) infrastructure to an _intake catalogue_, so you will find recipes may use either method to access model data. If you are halfway through a project using the cosima-cookbook and looking for resources, this [tag](https://github.com/COSIMA/cosima-recipes/tree/cosima_cookbook) marks the repository before most recipes were transitioned.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's just remove any references to cookbook... whoever uses cookbook they know, else they should just go to Intake

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I agree...

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's better to describe where we are at ... there's lots of unresolved references to the cookbook in docs and notebooks that will take some time to work through

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer we have a clean tutorial for the Intake and how people should open datasets and don't mention cookbook at all. It creates confusion.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I opened an issue to discuss this: #425

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated
To **Get Started** with the `cosima-cookbook`, clone this repository locally, probably best in your local space on one of the NCI HPC machines so you can have access to model output. The repository includes a bunch of examples with which you can begin to construct your own analysis code.
To **get started** with `cosima-recipes`, clone this repository in your local space on one of the NCI HPC machines so you can have access to model output. You should then be able to run these recipes through an [Australian Research Environment (ARE)](https://are.nci.org.au/) JupyterLab session running python. You need to join projects _hh5, xp65, ik11, cj50_ and _ol01_ to run the recipes and acccess the data analysed.

When starting ARE, include the projects in the _Storage_ line: _gdata/xp65+gdata/ik11+gdata/cj50+gdata/hh5+gdata/oi10_ as well as your own project. In _Module directories_, set _/g/data/hh5/public/modules_ and in _Modules_ set _conda/analysis3_.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add note about instance size

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we use this format for input the users should put enter?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point - yes :)

Co-authored-by: Navid C. Constantinou <navidcy@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@navidcy navidcy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm approving this! This is a good contribution!

We can continue working on the README and smooth the intake vs cookbook situation + more in other PRs, e.g., #433.

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I haven't updated to the new wiki, but otherwise i addressed the review comments

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Jul 29, 2024

No worries -- merge if you like and we'll update links to new wiki in a different PR

@anton-seaice anton-seaice merged commit 621d83d into COSIMA:main Jul 29, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@anton-seaice anton-seaice deleted the readme branch July 29, 2024 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants