Feature/router bgp

[shebang42]

add local_as* and description to iosxr_router_bgp_neighbor_group data-source and resource
add bgp_router_id and use_neighbor_group to iosxr_router_bgp_vrf data-source and resource

tests:

(base) ➜  ~/src/github/terraform-provider-iosxr git:(feature/router-bgp) ✗ 
> go test -v ./... -run RouterBGPVRF 
?       github.com/CiscoDevNet/terraform-provider-iosxr [no test files]
?       github.com/CiscoDevNet/terraform-provider-iosxr/internal/provider/client        [no test files]
?       github.com/CiscoDevNet/terraform-provider-iosxr/internal/provider/helpers       [no test files]
=== RUN   TestAccDataSourceIosxrRouterBGPVRFAddressFamily
--- PASS: TestAccDataSourceIosxrRouterBGPVRFAddressFamily (32.76s)
=== RUN   TestAccDataSourceIosxrRouterBGPVRFNeighborAddressFamily
--- PASS: TestAccDataSourceIosxrRouterBGPVRFNeighborAddressFamily (14.85s)
=== RUN   TestAccDataSourceIosxrRouterBGPVRF
--- PASS: TestAccDataSourceIosxrRouterBGPVRF (7.06s)
=== RUN   TestAccIosxrRouterBGPVRFAddressFamily
--- PASS: TestAccIosxrRouterBGPVRFAddressFamily (32.87s)
=== RUN   TestAccIosxrRouterBGPVRFNeighborAddressFamily
--- PASS: TestAccIosxrRouterBGPVRFNeighborAddressFamily (18.54s)
=== RUN   TestAccIosxrRouterBGPVRF
--- PASS: TestAccIosxrRouterBGPVRF (10.13s)
PASS
ok      github.com/CiscoDevNet/terraform-provider-iosxr/internal/provider       118.247s

[shebang42]

Do you have an update if/when this can be merged? It will simplify our workflow if we can use the official binary, since we have to use a local binary for this provider in our pipeline.

[tomvrugt]

Do you have an update if/when this can be merged? It will simplify our workflow if we can use the official binary, since we have to use a local binary for this provider in our pipeline.

@danischm Can you please have a look at this PR?

[tomvrugt]

@danischm can you please create a new release that contains this fix? Thanks!

[danischm]

Done